• Ciss0@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    My first ever GPU was ATI 9200 I got in Christmas, god I remember the good times playing RollerCoaster Tycoon on it :)

  • confusescountrynames@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s funny how they call the 5870 the best AMD GPU of all time.

    They are not wrong, but it’s also their biggest strategic mistake ever: right when they had Nvidia in the ropes and had a chance to crush them with top of the line performance by an insane margin, they decided on they brain dead small die strategy, leaving an escape route for a Nvidia to still remain on top with absolute performance even if their performance per area was a disaster.

    It’s just another example of AMD marketing shooting themselves in the foot.

    • strshp_enterprise@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yup. NVIDIA was able to pull ahead simply through brute force. Sure they ran hot and consumed a lot of power but that was negligible when they were doubling performance every generation.

    • GomaEspumaRegional@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      AMD didn’t have an alternative other than to go “small” die, since they needed margins and they couldn’t execute huge dies given their cost.

    • hardlyreadit@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I heard nothing but driver issue complaints during the rnda1 era so that doesn’t surprise me at all

    • TheArtBellStalker@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The 5700xt!!! Are you crazy. That’s the worst AMD/ATI card I’ve ever owned. Driver crash,crash,crash,crash,crash. Fixed after 6 months my ass.

    • psychoOC@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      5700xt is by far the worse gpu ever released. Its has the highest rma rates and the worse drivers. It is down as the worst possible gpu’s to exist.

  • MagicPistol@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I remember wanting a 9700 or 9800 pro so bad. But I was just a poor teenager and could only afford a shit GeForce mx440.

    • Royale_AJS@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This was me, a poor high school teenager with the MX440 64MB trying to play Counter-Strike the best I could. All my rich friends had 9700 Pro’s or even 9800 Pro’s. The evening of my graduation open house, I took $200 of the money I got and went to Best Buy and bought an X700 Pro 256MB AGP. I finally had something that beat my rich friends, until they all got X850’s or 6800 Ultra’s.

    • ocaralhoquetafoda@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I remember being a kid and selling stuff to save up for a 9600XT, the infamous Half Life 2 bundle. Had to wait for the launch and that’s how i met Steam

    • SolidQ1@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      i was buying Radeon 9000 pro instead GF MX440, at least 9000pro have pixel shader

    • kittensforpresident@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This was me too, except I had the mx440se. Trust Nvidia to make the special edition significantly worse than the normal model. My mates made the same mistake and we used to call it the “Shit Edition”

      Managed to move to the 9600pro after saving my pennies all year, was a huge upgrade. Those were the days…

    • topdangle@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      9800 pro was my first gpu purchase and it blew my mind. was able to play half life 2 with MSAA and everything looked smooth instead of the jagged mess I was used to.

    • SnuffleWumpkins@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      My 9500 was a beast. Just a slightly cut down 9700. It was faster than my buddies 9600.

      Second video card I ever owned. After my voodoo 3.

    • Entr0py64@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The 9800 Pro was the real best GPU, due to the dx9 bug fixes. I also think the list was mostly wrong. I’d say 9800 Pro, 1900XT, 390, Vega 56, 6700XT.

      Other points: Radeon 9000, cheap FULL dx8. Nothing else came close. GCN 1 (7970) was crap for drivers, and did not support encoding or freesync. Polaris (480) was completely pointless for 390 users, Vega 56 was the real upgrade, especially if you bought on the fire sale prices. Vega outlasted Pascal. Has HBCC. The 480 was the late to the party card, and you didn’t get the new features of Vega. It was ok, and a good price, not amazing.

      For right now, we have the 7800 and 7900. But I wouldn’t count top 5 for being new.

      Nvidia: TnT2: You didn’t need a Geforce, could completely skip them until dx8. 470 (best value) or 580 3GB: You could skip Kepler entirely with the 3GB. I wouldn’t count anything else due to bad value or AMD having better alternatives for the money. This is why I don’t count Pascal, because you needed a 1080TI for it to be worth it, and Vega 56 was better for the money. You can maybe count the 12GB 3060, but come on with the 1080p, that’s too dated.

  • FatFunkey@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    ….bruh how did the 9700 pro beat the 9800 pro it fucking came with half life 2 ffs .

    • Zaziel@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It was AMD’s true domination card for the generation it was in. I saw the benchmarks on Anandtech and I was floored.

    • iyute@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The 290X wasn’t that impressive at launch. Ran hot and wasn’t cheap enough to be a good value.

      • EnderOfGender@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        it was faster than the 780 and literally $250 less than the MSRP of the 780 and the 780ti wouldn’t come out for quite a while

      • ej102@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I feel it still deserves a spot on the list. Also the heat issues were mostly addressed with Sapphire’s coolers for example. Just seems highly critical to write it off, at least to me.

      • BigV95@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        What are you talking about man it was on par if not faster than the first Titan…

        • jk47_99@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Tom’s literally called it the “Titan killer”. Yes the reference cooler ran hot and sounded like a hair dryer, but the price to performance was amazing. And the AIB cards had some great models, like the Sapphire Toxic.

    • Noreng@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nowhere, like it should be. The launch was a disaster because AMD pushed the clock/power targets extremely high in order to “compete” with the 780 and 780 Ti, with the end result being a jet engine in terms of noise.

      It wasn’t until February before MSI and ASUS released better cooled cards, at which point the damage from reviews and lack of holiday sales had accumulated.

      In the 7970’s case, AMD had at least the benefit of being 3 months early compared to Nvidia.

      • GuttedLikeCornishHen@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        What are you on about, nvidia had to lower price on 780 twice and issue an emergency SKU in form of 780Ti to be able to compete on price/performance with Hawaii. R9 290 (non-X) was a steal at its price considering how long it managed to stay relevant in the years ahead. GCN driver improvement also added a significant chunk of performance (9k GS in FS at release and around 15k with OC and driver improvements 3 years later). Also, Kepler blower cards were also loud, so the point is sort of not a point at all

        • Noreng@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          How would you have known that the 290 would perform better in 2016?

          As for the price cuts, I remember the 780 Ti launch, and the 780 launch was effectively a cut from the Titan.

          The 780 price cut was the reason for the jet engine cooler on the 290-series in the first place.

      • Noreng@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The 290X wasn’t even close to being as competitive as the also-omitted 4870

  • GuttedLikeCornishHen@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    My list:

    1. R9 290 - last GPU before 20 nm disaster (not mentioned in the topic, it wasn’t Kepler that got parity in terms of tech process, it was that ATi lost its edge when 20nm didn’t bear fruit)

    2. 9500 non pro (L-shaped memory bank) - a fairly good chance to unlock it to 9700

    3. N21 varieties (it’d be the first but mining craze killed it)

    4. Cypress - another Khan like success that forced nV to start to play dirty (mGPU frametime “analysis”, GameWorks, PhysX etc), wood screw-augmented “Thermi” flagship in Jen-Hsun hands

    5. R580 - another glimmer before the big disaster (history certainly repeats sometimes) and an example of quick recovery after so-so R520 (and terribad medium/low-end parts)

  • Mageoftheyear@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ah the 9700 Pro…

    I’ll always remember it because I could only afford the 9600 Pro lol.

    Not that i cared. I freaking loved that PC.

  • Solembumm2@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    7970 is probably the gpu with longest life cycle from “can it run x” point of view.

  • just_hest@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hey I’ve owned/have two of these GPUS. My current GPU is the RX 6800 XT and my previous one was the ASUS ROG Matrix HD 7970 Platinum. Before my current GPU was a RX Vega 64 LC.

  • Number-1Dad@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The 6950xt I bought at $599 was a fantastic value. While it’s launch price was a little hard to stomach, I think as it started to go down in price it deserves a place on the value list.

  • INITMalcanis@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Shout out the the Duron line. Suddenly we could get decent a FPU without paying the Intel tax, and that mattered to me back then because I sure did not have a lot of spare cash.

    My Duron 900 was a heck of an upgrade from the old K6-400. It lasted me until the Athlon 2500+ provided a similar incredible performance hike at a very forgiving price.