• gaymersriseup666@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is conflicting for me because on the one hand, this is objectively offside even if it’s by millimeters, and I like this technology for eliminating the human error element.

    On the other, the offside rule itself is a bit insane to me these days with VAR—I feel like the spirit of the rule has been lost—this is not giving the attacking player a clear advantage. Yes it’s offside by the law—but for what?

  • Rude-Strength-2957@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    argh i know that its right, like its good that its objective, but it does sortve rub me the wrong way be because the attacking player gained no advantage from being such a small margin offside

  • HarbyFullyLoaded_12@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s harsh but I will never argue against the semi automated offsides. They’re always right. It’s not a bunch of useless cunts drawing lines.

    • vintage-buttplugs@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Instances like this isn’t why the offside rule was introduced though. It’s morally wrong for this to be called offside

        • vintage-buttplugs@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Na, not having it. You can’t honestly think looking at that image this is deserving of an offside decision. This sport is fast becoming a referee-centric enterprise and it’s sad to see fuck all pushback from fans. In fact, people actually defend shit like this

          • Nilbogoblins@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It does beg the question what do we want from our football. I like how it’s objective but I would rather a ref got it wrong and let the flow of the game continue frankly.

            No one would have argued over a call as tight as this this before VAR right or wrong.

      • tiezalbo@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The line has to be drawn somewhere though and regardless of where that is, you will always have these calls 1mm over the line

  • dibilnahuy@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    these cgi simulations, what are they based on?

    do they take camera angles and kind of average it out?

    it boggles my mind that these decisions are based on camera angles which at 23.98 framerate will always have motion blur

    hockey struggles with this as well.

    tennis made a move to high framerate cameras, i think?

  • Glass-Star6635@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Genuinely don’t think this is how the rule was intended to be interpreted. Should really just use feet because this looks like a perfectly timed run to me.

  • badassery11@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Are we sure the system is this accurate? I don’t know how it could be without, like, 970 cameras.

    • Chrissy_____@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You don’t, but scientists who made it and high school students interested in the technology are able to easily comprehend it

  • akselmonrose@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    To be fair. With modern AI. We could completely eliminate referees between completely in a few years. Just need enough camera angles with high fps. Would fans go for that I wonder?