• jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Breaches are one of those things that no one cares about until they happen. Assessing and mitigating risks is costly and no one wants to spend money on that.

    And let’s be real, the penalties for data breaches, especially ones that transpired due to willful negligence, are an insufficient motivator. It happens so often that the public just kind of forgets about it the next day.

    Remember the Equifax breach in 2017? The one where the personal data of 147 million people was exposed? Well Equifax got a slap on the wrist when they should have been fined into oblivion. That’s the only way businesses will start taking cyber security seriously. The US desperately needs GDPR-like legislation because at this point our collective lack of data privacy and security is a joke.

    • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Breaches are one of those things that no one cares about until they happen.

      You have people like me on the inside repeating “Spend money now or lose money and reputation later.” The only time I had a client REALLY listen was when the government made them, and then they wanted to figure out the cheapest way to do the bare minimum.

      But capitalism is great and keeps us safe and free y’all!

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d be happy with a federal level recognition to a right to privacy beyond the 4th amendment. That alone might be enough to drastically increase the ramifications for breaches made possible through negligence and could include jail time.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s a term used for when IT operations teams want to keep the status quo design of their environments when upgrading or modernizing their infrastructure, instead of fixing and securing things while they’re at it. The common excuse is that they will fix issues once migration/upgrade is complete, either because they’re on a tight timeline to do it, they’re afraid of breaking things, or just plain lazy. They will say it’s temporary until things have settled down. And we all know there’s nothing more permanent than a temporary implementation. The result is the same issues and problems exist, just on new infrastructure.

  • cobson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    yesterday fowl train store transport edge living healthy nation deep nerve limit bright bulb under trousers tree advertisement sign safe seed print powder that ice sock flag secret farm field shelf behaviour egg very insect start step existence enough present no pleasure sense liquid rub friend a fork dead meeting

  • cobson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    some statement circle who cloth cover camera minute probable porter strange band reward heart like sand sudden chance if shelf station pot public complex room steam wet hearing political rat fight selection crack meal near public fear how high beautiful sugar turn stem look good drawer living early complete egg

  • cobson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    clean over woman plant flat pleasure frame market tooth pot walk pin burn coal work old horse size fight night shelf cup committee event fat broken let story girl wire boot stitch thread daughter store material transport yes increase stiff part lip reaction size living possible bulb side learning probable

  • cobson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    copper interest cotton and different death colour about foot go song first engine solid very true way summer winter effect curve danger tendency protest wet field act swim bee jump regret use silk library copper nose much look poison thought kettle house comparison seem sheep jelly opposite steel spade division