Although legal, the time frame and approach seems designed to shield the company from negligence.

  • MamboGator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t understand how this can be legal. It’s like if I sent out a mass email saying everyone owes me $50 unless they opt out.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not explicitly illegal, and it will dissuade some users from litigation. Even if it does not hold up in court, it will be a road block that requires you hiring a lawyer and going to court in order to get started.

  • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    Although the article says it’s probably not going to be upheld by judges, seeing Nazi hackers isn’t great.

    • However, because those accounts were linked to the user’s DNA relatives through a feature offered by the company, hackers were able to access the personal data of other customers.
    • After the attack, hackers published around 1 million data points about users with Ashkenazi Jewish heritage and information about more than 300,000 users with Chinese heritage.
    • The company did not publicly reveal the full extent of the breach until around two months after it occurred.
  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    There are several reasons I never used 23andMe, one being that I live in the US and wouldn’t want to risk the data getting leaked to health insurance companies.