• u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I am really confused now. I know Discman is Sony’s name, but generally people refer to any such portable CD player as “discman”. At least where I live.
      And it’s not just regular people, even shops refer to them as dicmans.
      Here are some examples to back my claims:

      examples

      https://www.alza.sk/discmany/18886534.htm
      https://aukro.sk/discmany
      https://www.mall.sk/discmany
      https://discmany.heureka.sk/
      https://www.okay.sk/collections/discmany

      The only exception seems to be Nay, referring to this category as “Portable CD players”.

      • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s very interesting! Around me, we called them CD Players, it must be a regional thing. Many people called the portable cassette player a Walkman, even though that was a lineup of products from Sony.

        Looking on US Amazon, there are several players that have Discman, Walkman, or both in the titles. Sony must not be enforcing their trademarks (wrong term?) for the first non-sponsored listing being called:

        2000mAh Rechargeable Discman CD Player:Walkman CD Player

      • poppy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah we called them all discman too. A Kleenex/tissue situation imo.

        Edit: though I do concede an official label in some sort of display probably should use the generic form “portable CD player” or something similar.

      • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        generally people refer to any such portable CD player as “discman”. At least where I live.

        Yeah, and there’s people that call them Kleenex, Velcro, and iPads. That doesn’t make them right.

        There’s no confusion - Discman is the model of Sony’s portable CD players. People using the term incorrectly is simply that.

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Man that one can play mp3 discs. That has to be newer than 2002. Burning CDs wasn’t super common yet.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 months ago

      I had a aftermarket head unit that played mp3 cds in 2002.

      I had a mp3 player in 1999.

      We were definitely burning cds back then, this woulda come at a premium but the tech was there.

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        I remember downloading mp3s from usenet in 1999 on my Windows 95 computer. I’d start the download, go to work, then retrieve the file when I got home.

        I felt so fancy buying a CD burner at Best Buy so I could burn them onto CDs. It was the first PC component I ever installed by myself.

        • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          We share pretty similar experiences with this. Only that in 1999 both our ISDN lines were in use during the day. That robbed me of the possibility of continuously downloading files, getting home and start enjoying the downloads.

          I remember being bummed by this back in the day.

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        My brother had an mp3 player in 1999. I think it had 16MB of storage space. I didn’t see the point of it when you could only put like 5 songs on the thing.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 months ago

          I could fit roughly 1 hour of music on mine, longer if I dropped the bitrate to 96kbps instead of 128.

          The biggest benefit of the mp3 player was that the anti-skip protection didn’t drain the battery twice as fast, no moving parts so it never skipped. This seemed super cool to me because I skateboarded and stuff and generally liked the idea of no skips.

          • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            The biggest benefit of the mp3 player was that the anti-skip protection didn’t drain the battery twice as fast

            I strongly disagree. In those days, mp3 players that fit single CDs that were slightly larger than a modern day thumb drive. And you could get 128mb ones for slightly more money. But that was much smaller and more portable than something that had to fit an entire CD.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        BMWs in 2002 used Alpine head units. I knew their aftermarket units could play MP3 CDs so I thought “why not test it out?” Turns out it could play it just fine. It mapped the folder buttons to the seek/scan buttons if you held it and played them just fine. I was floored it did that but wasn’t anywhere in the manual.

    • damium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      I had that very device right about 2002. Put my whole CD collection on a few mp3 disks. Replaced it a few years later with a 6GB mp3 player.

      • caesar_salad83@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Me too! I think it was around 2007 that i got an iRiver H10. My only other standalone music player I ever bought with my own money.

    • RadButNotAChad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sure it was, in America at least. I think I got my first PC that could burn disks in like 1998 and it was a mass marketed Compaq from Circuit City. Napster showed up the next year and CD burning exploded. Napster was dead by 2001.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I remember getting a MP3 player in 2000 that had 16Mb of space. If I compressed the shit out of the songs, I could fit almost a whole album on there!

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I had this exact model in 2002. It was a revelation and possibly one of the best portable CD players ever released. You could sit there and tap it all day and it wouldn’t skip.

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is this your kid nephew’s “museum”?

    “Old” is not 20 years and that is not a goddamn discman. Sorry, Ralphie. You can do better.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Wasn’t the actual “Discman” a Sony product? In the same line as their Walkman cassette players, but for CDs?

    I had a Walkman back in the day; but never an official Discman player. All my CD players were pieces of shit 😩

    • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yes. The pictured item is a portable cd player, not a Discman.

      Apparently SL-SK420 or whatever that says didn’t have the same ring to it.

    • Donut@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is an interesting phenomenon called a proprietary eponym, where a brand name becomes synonymous with a product.

      Just like walkman and disc man, in my language we call a car satnav a “TomTom” after the brand that popularised it here.

    • espentan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeap, Discman was the name used by Sony up until around the year 2000, when they changed it to “CD Walkman”.

  • Crozekiel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This thing is so recent it could play MP3s… The first Discman was released in 1984. I’m actually really confused why they picked such a recent version, the technology was almost phased out when this thing was released. FFS the original iPod came out a year before this thing…

  • Konstant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve seen consoles like the Sega Genesis and the Master System in a temporary exposition and end up taking photos since I haven’t seen one for so long lmao

  • Bread@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean it was over twenty one years ago. Technology ages fast. You can also say it had historical significance so it can end up in a museum earlier than you might expect.

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    warehouse staff have already removed the artifact for safe keeping and replaced it with a hastily-sourced replica.

  • Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    mine is in a box in the basement. My dad found a CD with songs from a German kid’s TV-Show (Die Sendung mit der Maus) from my childhood a few years back. Playing this one CD is the only job of that player now. Still does it though.