• Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    “develop a technological standard that might turn a user’s electronic device into the proof of age necessary to access restricted online content.”

    Can we not? Can parents just take care of their kids like they have for thousands of years instead of futility trying to babyproof the internet for a minority of people? Jesus.

      • pugsnroses77@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        or a real example that most newer cars have a “check rear seat for occupant” alert because some people forget their babies in the backseat and they die…

    • Dempf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That was the opinion of the Supreme Court nearly 20 years ago in Ashcroft vs. ACLU, but here we are.

    • Jknaraa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Can parents just take care of their kids like they have for thousands of years

      Okay, so lets be certain that kids do not have a direct connection with every intelligence agency, mafia and terrorist organization in the world right in their pocket, just as they did not for thousands of years. Now, to be clear I really don’t like the approach they’ve chosen here (I think we need to go much deeper into the fundamental design of the Internet), but I would hope it’s not a controversial statement to assert that our society has taken a very sharp turn for the worse ever since the Internet became ubiquitous in children’s development, and I think that really ought to prompt discussion about how it’s being used.

    • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      So there are laws that people agree with that say people under 18 cannot buy/see porn at the store. What makes this any different

      • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Basically PH and other xxx sites need you to verify your identity by uploading your ID. It’s what should be unconstitutional and a violation of privacy.

      • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Probably the bigger issue is the centralization of the internet

        If we would have some more decentralized way of consuming content, then it would be harder to censor or control it

        The internet nowadays is essentially just google, facebook, and pornhub

        So applying a rule you can just target one company which will comply anyway because this is communism

        • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I believe the responsibility should be on the parents to keep their children from viewing porn before they’re 18. Not the government. I also believe there should be at least some control over what minors have access to. Will it ever be 100%? Nope. All we can do is the best we can do

    • folkrav@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The people who really think of age verification as effective measures tend to also be against having those in schools in the first place.

  • CodeName@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Are they going to institute the same rules for every online streaming service? Because what if the parents don’t set up controls and their kids watch an R rated movie?

    This is the parents responsibility and there are tools to keep kids from seeing harmful content.