I know posting this sucks but the more you know. Better to know than not know.

  • yesterdayshero@aussie.zoneM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure I’ve missed it, but what exactly have they considered as “high coffee consumption”? Some of their findings show some level of coffee consumption can be beneficial, or inconclusive. Which is usually why most of these studies can be summed up with… just don’t overdo it.

    • Treevan 🇦🇺@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      High coffee consumption was defined as ≥4 cups per day in most original studies. Seventeen studies used a definition of ≥6 cups per day. Low/no coffee consumption was defined as <1 cup per day in most original studies. Fifteen studies used a definition of <2 cups per day. Four studies used a definition of never drinking.

  • Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I shall make a point of continuing to consume coffee at or close to sea level.

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The study included decaf coffee when counting cups of coffee. But how does that saying go? Correlation doesn’t equal causation?

  • tau@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    but associated with a decreased risk of small vessel ischemic stroke

    So I got that going for me…

  • nxfsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Studies show that drinking non-ethically sourced coffee makes you smarter than drinking ethically-sourced coffee.