• Saltarello@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 months ago

    I dunno if TV is dead per se as we all enjoy watching shows/movies. Not really interested in gimmicks - we only have 4K as all new TV’s are 4K & we only got it because our previous TV failed & they can no longer be repaired.

    All i want is a good quality dumb screen. You can stick all your smart features where the sun dont shine, I’ll handle everything via a separate box that I control thank you. I’ll not be at the mercy of your shitty EULA, you won’t monitor my viewing habits or force ads into the UI or remove your dogshit apps without warning. Our TV has never been online, HTPC with a couple of USB TV tuners, uBlock Origin, an interface of my choosing, remote control & lots of storage handles everything. Still perfectly happy watching SD stuff, the only 4K we watch is YouTube.

  • TK420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    Gizmochina doesn’t understand that physical TV sales has nothing to do with “TV being dead,” what a disconnect here.

    “TV is dead” because it is full of ads, and crap nobody watches, not because global flat screen TV sales are down.

  • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s because there’s no reason for most people to buy another TV. The majority of people who would want one already have a TV, and there has been no technological advancement in the last decade or two that would entice anyone to throw away their already perfectly acceptable large LCD/OLED/whatever television just to buy another one just like it.

    The only thing anyone has been able to come up with is making all TV’s internet connected and “smart,” which is a feature that approximately nobody except the MBA’s in charge of the companies cranking them out seems to actually want.

    • preasket@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This. Nowadays people mostly buy TVs when their old ones break. There’s no marginal improvement. The industry is here to stay, but its high growth days are in the past.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        And we’ve mostly hit the limit of usable maximum sizes. For like the last two decades you could upgrade your TV to the next bigger size every few years for the same money you paid for the last one.
        I remember starting with a maybe… 21" LCD TV back in 2005ish, and for that money today I could get like 70" TV. I don’t have space to fit one that large, nor do I have any need for it even if I could.

      • Supercritical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        We have also seen the budget range improve in quality and affordability. There will always be cheap junk TVs and overly expensive TVs, but that midrange, where most people buy, has become rock solid. There just isn’t much region to upgrade at the moment.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Actually, a LOT of people stream with a smart TV instead of a separate device. More than half in the US.

      https://gitnux.org/smart-tv-sales-statistics/

      This tends to track with what I see in my family and friend’s homes. People tend to do couch streaming via the smart TV’s apps.

      Personally, I think a fast, separate HDMI CEC device is a MUCH better user experience, and it’s still one remote. But for whatever reason, a lot of people aren’t opting to go with a separate AppleTV, GoogleTV ChromeCast, Roku, game console, etc.

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        But do they use it because it’s there, or do they actually go out and buy a TV because of the smart features? I’d much rather have a separate device (and do) than use the built in smart features. I would greatly prefer to buy a TV with no smart features and just continue using my AppleTV than have to buy a new TV every time the built in system stopped getting updates.

        • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Upgraded my £200 dumb LCD to a £1000 OLED 3 years ago. My wife much prefers the simplicity and reliability of the TV remote and inbuilt smart features over separate devices. It’s all personal preference

          • thejml@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            We were that way as well for a few years. Then the updates cause the sluggishness of the internal processor to become apparent… and then the updates stop completely. An internal smart system can’t be upgraded, external ones can. Not to mention that the HDMI spec will auto start the TVs and put it to the right input automatically when you turn in a connected device.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          There was a time when people were buying the smart TV because Netflix and Apple were then apps on the TV and used the same remote.

          But the apps are old and crunchy, the tv shovels ads at you, and the steamers are no longer offering the value required to make smart TVs a prime consolidation target.

          I am looking forward to the contraction of the market and a shift back to “just a TV with 4 HDMIs” models. No tuners even.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      people do want smart features on tvs.

      they just dont want ads or the privacy nightmare tvs are.

    • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The one thing I disagree with is the technological advancement. I feel like there has been advancement, but the problem is the cost of those advancements. No one is pining to drop thousands/tens of thousands of dollars on OLED, Micro-led, or whatever the hell else they have come out with over the years. On top of that the crappy interfaces of these TV’s as well as privacy problems. See the recent roku debacle.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tvs have a short lifespan, now. People have to replace them like every 5 years on average, I’d guess. I think people have less tvs in their homes, though.

      The other part of this is that people brought a lot of tvs up to a couple years ago when there was a decade long stretch of LED back-lit tvs. The problem was that there might be 100 leds back there and a single one going out junked the tvs. They were cheaply fixable, but not easily fixable. Most people wouldn’t be able to do it.

      • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        People replace them that often!? Damn…I have an old 1080p LED tv from Samsung that’s more than a decade old and still going strong. Blacks aren’t the best on it, but not bad enough to warrant an upgrade.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You kind of got lucky. I have the skills and equipment to find the bad ones and replace those LEDs on them. Keep an eye on Facebook marketplace and it’s impressive how many people will put up their three year old 65+ inch tvs that don’t work for free just to get rid of them because they can’t fit in a trash can.

          Getting to the LEDs without breaking anything is usually the hard part. Aside from like a million screws and clips, the screen itself is extremely thin and fragile, and you have to pick it up and move it around without cracking it. Little 40 or 50 inch tvs are fairly easy to do, but those 70+ inch tvs are going to take handled suction cups and a couple of people.

          Then finding the burnt out led isn’t much work with the right tools, and neither is soldering on a new led. So much trouble for just a single little LED that I can literally but in rolls of 100 for like $12.

          So yeah, your TV breaks because of a 12 cent led. And that’s consumer prices. Samsung probably pays like 5 cents.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        replace them every 5 years

        Less if you went with Visio lol

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Go back to selling “dumb” sets and I’d buy 4 brand new, big TVs right now. Seriously, I would replace both of my existing TV’s and finally get ones for the other major rooms in my house almost immediately. But I won’t, because all you can get now are smart TVs and smart TVs are just fucking awful.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I wouldn’t mind basic TVs being sold again, but you can just buy any smart TV and not connect it to the internet in order to have the functional equivalent of a dumb TV. I always just use Rokus or other external streaming devices rather than the constantly out-of-date TV streaming apps native to the TV itself.

  • invisiblegorilla@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Maybe if they werent all packed full of preinstalled shit that takes up what measily space is available, didn’t force ads into the menus, and actually had real smart features not the half assed bullshit they put out… People might upgrade TVs…

    Also… The content just isn’t there these days. Movies are crap and rehashes of the same old shit, series are generic and characterless and even music sounds shitter than it used to be.

    Fuck all your media whether its social or propaganda you bunch of nosy data mining cunts… The next phase is going to be worse with empty AI generated shit with zero originality.

  • SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    My dumb TV is 15 years old. It’s a bit small for the space and there’s a W burned into it but you can only see it on static screens.

    I would like a new one but it’s pretty low down on the list of things I need to buy with the 37p I manage to save each month.

  • mPony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m pretty sure that PEOPLE ALREADY OWN A TV and probably can’t afford to replace it.
    I have no intention of replacing mine.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Don’t forget enshittification. I use my TV less and only streaming but am really frustrated by ever more intrusive ads and surveillance. Sometimes I’m just too annoyed to turn on the big TV.

    Mine is only 3 years old, but I can definitely see not bothering to get a new one when it’s old, unless they start making dumb TVs again. There are plenty of screens in the house and done of them are less annoying to use

    • michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nothing prevents you from using your Smart TV in the same way as a dumb TV. Just don’t connect your TV to the internet and use a third-party device via HDMI.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Many, even when offline, will constantly pester you to connect to a network, or will attempt to connect to any open one it finds.

            Some have offline, non-targeted ads from factory.

            There have recently been trials of Amazon-powered TVs automatically linking to any Echo devices it can find and using it as a bridge to get internet. I’m unsure if that’s something they’re actually going to go ahead with right now though.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Absolutely. Dumb TVs going forward. Unfortunate that the best screens like those made by Samsung are ruined by surveillance and hardware that can’t run the “smart” OS for more than a few years without eventually running like dog shit.

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Make more dumb TVs and my interest in buying a new one goes up significantly. Im actively avoiding buying a new one even though I have to furninsh a good sized living room and all I have right now is a bit small for the space. It’ll still work.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are tons of dumb TVs out there but they’re more expensive because the ads and data harvesting subsidizes the cost.

      I know it’s not a perfect suggestion but I agree with the other comment: buy a smart TV and never connect it to the internet. The vast majority of displays don’t gain anything (outside of the “smart” features) with firmware updates. The exceptions to that are very rare.

      It sucks to have to buy a streaming box on top of it but the two items combined is less than a commercial (dumb) display. Even at cost.

      Though instead of a Chromecast for streaming, I’d consider an AppleTV…I’m not a fan of Apple but it’s hands down the best streaming box I’ve used outside of a dedicated HTPC.

      • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I keep hearing people say that, but I paid thousands of dollars for my TV to still have ads. The days of if you don’t pay for the product then you are the product is dead. You will pay for it and still be the product regardless of cost.

      • crossover@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s sad how Apple’s strategy of “just use an actually fast CPU and make a Home Screen without ads” is a breakthrough in the industry. It shows what a fucking mess everyone else is in.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The home screen on an AppleTV has ads, unfortunately. The main thing I like about it is how responsive it is - made possible by both the hardware and software. I also really like the remote, though I preferred the one from a generation or two ago.

          What I DON’T like about it is that a few years ago Apple disabled IP control unless you set it up through HomeKit. If you don’t want to use HomeKit, enjoy your IR control.

      • femtech@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        i connect my smart TV, along with IoT devices to an internet only group with DNS adblock. I also use an Xbox for streaming but looking at replacing it with a shield or something once my gamepass runs out.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You can always just not use the smart features, and if you do want them, pick up a chromecast to plug into it. Walmart’s one is like $20 and holds its own against the more expensive ones.

  • Damaskox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t remember when I watched the telly at home previously. Most of my entertainment are games and then some YouTube and movies not so often (lurking in friend’s online streaming services or googling “watch x for free”).

    Stopped watching the television when too many ads erupted even between the movies that were my last interest in this service.

    Most of my telly shows I see nowadays are at a friend’s place, and I’m every time annoyed about the amount of ads.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    With some exceptions, enthusiasm in technology is in decline in general. We are peaking in terms of rate of progress across the board, from computer speed to smart phone innovation to TV specs. When’s the last time ordinary folks got excited about a new phone release? Who cares about a TV larger than 60 inches? It’s not like most people can even afford a wall big enough to put it on. Who cares about anything more than 4k on a tiny screen?

    Meanwhile, the cost of living is only increasing, and consumer trust in product life support is in decline. Stories about TVs listening to private conversations, or holding your device hostage for forced TOS updates, anti-right to repair, the mountain of e-waste and micro plastics, pervasive DRM, enshitified services, subscription hardware…

    Should we be surprised? No.

    The only thing that gets me excited about tech any more is repairability and offline/local networking.

    • Kaiyoto@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I loved my projector! I found it on ebay for a steal apparently because when I went to find my next one I couldn’t find the same quality for a reasonable price range I could afford at the time. When this TV blows up I’ll probably look at a projector again.

      • N2Narkosis@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m actually in the market for a new tv and have been tempted to go the projector route, especially with the advancements in short throw projectors. However, I’m scared off by the fact that I would like to enjoy the same experience during the day as I would at night. My living room isn’t the ideal dark theater room…

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ll keep my dumb TVs and monitors over a spysmart tv anytime. Can’t wait for them to roll out pay-to-use-tv next.

    • MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Especially be sure to avoid anything with ACR (automatic content recognition). If it detects you’re watching content from an unapproved source, it will bug you to watch it on that approved source such as a streaming service. It’s just a software update, or a congress bill away from reporting anyone who watches pirated content on their TV. So just beware.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    4K came out in 2012 and 8K just isn’t that popular, in part due to content issues but also people’s eyesight. If you don’t need a new TV now, why would you buy an upgrade?

    • michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yesterday I was in an electronics store and saw a 65" 8K TV and a 65" 4K TV. The difference in image clarity is almost imperceptible even if you get up close. Maybe 8K will be useful for huge TVs like 85" or more.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You say I need to get my wife to spend her yearly bonus on an 85" 8k TV … for science?

        I’ll do it. It’ll be hard to pitch that but dammit it’s for science.

      • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        And it should stay that way. I don’t want another product with planned obsolescence.

        They could only try to end your TV by not supporting its apps because of its age, but luckily you can just plug a computer or a console on it to get all the apps you need.

        Still, for now, I enjoy using my TV apps with an alternate launcher like Flauncher instead of the normal Android one.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sorry, your TV OS is no longer supported. All your apps will stop working tomorrow. We are sorry for the inconvenience.

        Solved

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Smart people with money perhaps. Not everyone can shell out several times more money to pay for privacy…

          • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t agree with this as it sounds a bit elitist.

            Some people just don’t want to buy another device and use more electricity to watch a movie.

            But I know what you mean.