• Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    174
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    /s is an excellent modifier for sarcasm. There’s no tone in text and bold/italic can only do so much. And with how many absolute crackpots are posting all over the internet, I’d prefer to be sure to not lump in a jokester with the absolute nutjobs.

      • Ignacio@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It wouldn’t be the first time I get myself into a trouble because of that :(

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the only legitimate defense for having to tag your sarcasm I’ve ever read.

        Back in MY DAY, nobody tagged their sarcasm on BBS or IRC and we ALL UNDERSTOOD AAAAA (but srsly for folks who have trouble with tone you’re fully right.)

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What are you talking about? Even usenet in the 80s recommended using emoticons to mark sarcasm/joking remarks.

          Avoid sarcasm and facetious remarks.

          Without the voice inflection and body language of personal communication these are easily misinterpreted. A sideways smile, :-), has become widely accepted on the net as an indication that “I’m only kidding”. If you submit a satiric item without this symbol, no matter how obvious the satire is to you, do not be surprised if people take it seriously.

          Source

          • Veraxus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            This. I remember having a text file of emoticons back in the day because I couldn’t remember what they were supposed to mean (and often didn’t mean what I thought). :-/

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s a valid point! I forgot now many emoticons I’d use back then. I’ve always hated pointing out my sarcasm using extra things, though… I prefer to do it using italics, which is reeeeal helpful on Reddit where it goes over nobody’s heads at all.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        As someone with autism, I’m here to say that it is actually the opposite of helpful.

        People need challenges in order to grow. They need opportunities to fail.

        Putting training wheels on sarcasm makes autistic people even further behind the social curve by depriving us of opportunities to fail.

        Much like a sterile childhood environment has been scientifically proven to be a causal factor in developing allergies as an adult, I predict that science will eventually establish a causal link between lack of ambiguous communication during developmental years, and reduced intelligence in life.

        Human society is so fucking hard to understand for an autistic person, and I really appreciate your looking out for me, but the struggle is worth it, and human culture is intricate and beautiful, and that’s why I chose this username.

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay but lots of other autistic people I know really appreciate tone indicators so you cannot really speak for everyone. Not to mention, why does knowing that something was meant to be sarcastic hinder learning instead of essentially guessing?

        • kitedemon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You misunderstand, this is from my own perspective as an autistic person. Plus, the lack of tone of voice over text can make communication harder, for everyone. It’s literally just a tool for communication, clearing up what you mean.

          • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But that’s the point of sarcasm. Jonathan Swift got lots of death threats by mail after writing “A Modest Proposal,” and he expected it! If someone doesn’t want to risk being misunderstood, they should not write the opposite of what they mean.

    • Seraph@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me it’s born out of this moment: “Wait, will someone see this joke and think I’m serious? If they did they’d think I’m a psycho…”

      • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Am i wooshing myself??

        That is literally the point of sarcasm. People legitimately wanted to murder Jonathan Swift.

        If you write “/s”, just write the direct unironic statement in the first place.

        • starman2112@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “If you want to tell a joke in which the humor is derived from you saying something incorrect, or something that would be offensive if you genuinely believed it, you should instead just say the actual truth and never use sarcasm again”

          That’s actually such a good idea, it would make life on the internet so much better /s

          • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you want to make a joke assume that some people won’t get it. If you don’t want any ambiguity then no, do not use sarcasm. If you write “/s”, you’re not being sarcastic at all, you’re just using a double negative.

      • Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        People on Reddit are scared of downvotes affecting their karma score, so they have to tag controversial comments to make it absolutely clear if their comment is sarcasm.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have used it because my sarcastic comment, read at face value, might encourage someone to support something I despise. I’m not interested in creating or bolstering that shit, I just want to make fun of it. Karma points never had anything to do with it. I had millions but what’s a million nothings, still nothing. Reddit Karma is just multiplying by zero.

        • starman2112@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Personally I used it to keep shinigami eyes users from tagging my then-universal handle as problematic when I made an off-color joke. I’ve been banned from subreddits I never heard of because of something I said as a joke in a totally different subreddit

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      /S Is aN ExCeLlEnT MoDiFiEr fOr sArCaSm. ThErE’S No tOnE In tExT AnD BoLd/iTaLiC CaN OnLy dO So mUcH. aNd wItH HoW MaNy aBsOlUtE CrAcKpOtS ArE PoStInG AlL OvEr tHe iNtErNeT, i’d pReFeR To bE SuRe tO NoT LuMp iN A JoKeStEr wItH ThE AbSoLuTe nUtJoBs.

      • baronofclubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d much rather “/s” than this. Though the difference may be small, this text reads as sardonic, while sarcasm may not always be meant in a mocking tone. Plus readability is important to me.

      • starman2112@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        tHiS is only useful for short phrases. Saying more than one sentence in this style makes me just skip the paragraph because it’s annoying to try to read.

    • Inventis@citizensgaming.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I lot of use of /s just indicates that there are a lot of jaded people making snide comments. We haven’t gotten to that stage yet.

    • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s the whole point of sarcasm though, that the delivery seems genuine. Don’t write the opposite of what you mean if you aren’t willing to have some people misunderstand you.

      And yes, people who use sarcastic tone in conversation are also missing the point. They also should not say the opposite of what they mean.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sarcasm was developed in spoken word. If you are using the written word, it needs to be painfully obvious if you want the meaning to come across. But due to Poe’s Law, that’s becoming harder and harder these days. Especially in the political and human rights discussion.

        No one is forcing you to use /s. But shitting on people using it because you don’t think it’s “pure” is asinine and also abelism.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, that’s so much worse here… The atheist posts are making me cringe pretty hard. I’m am atheist, so that’s saying something.

      It’s like we got the best, and the worst, from Reddit.

    • DrQuint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I sternly believe that of all things on the internet, the one time you’re actually allowed to feel superior and bully someone else is when they refuse to take a screenshot of a PC game and instead post a phone picture and then defend themselves calling it ‘easier that way’.

      One of those people recently even killed off several Dota 2 custom games, in a weird domino effect that literally started from them refusing to learn. They are acceptable targets, bullying them is justified, because they are stupid and you are superior.

  • Lininop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe, but it seems all the people who think they are better than everyone else because they downloaded a different social media app made their way over here as well.

  • Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bashing denizens who decide to denote their sarcasm is as /stupid as bashing those who don’t. “Oh no, now that the tone has been set the point is ruined!” Gosh, it must suck to be you, I’m genuinely sorry this is the way your brain works.

    • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not that the point is ruined. It’s that it’s no longer sarcasm. The whole point of sarcasm is that it seems like the message is genuine. Ironically, using /s makes a statement unsarcastic.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well no, because the /s tag isn’t symmetrical.

      In cases where the /s tag is used instead of sarcasm being interpreted successfully, there’s no mechanism to determine how well bonded and ready for complex communication a group is.

      It’s similar to banter, where one insults one’s friends in good fun. It’s a readiness test. The guy who gets insulted by your banter isn’t ready to communicate at a complex level with you.

      Same for people who can’t figure out when you’re being sarcastic.

      Misinterpretation of sarcasm is a canary in the coal mine, an indicator that complex topics aren’t going to be successfully discussed here, because there’s too much misinterpretation happening.

      • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        oh well. Worse than stupidity, we have here a strayed pedantically breeded nonsensical being.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmy is definitely heavily skewing towards early-adopters. Doesn’t mean there can’t be dumb early-adopter tho.

  • JGrffn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We have editable titles and I see far worse titles, title grammar, and title punctuation in here than on reddit. Do you really think there’s no stupid here?

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, those are the only objective standards of intelligence, even accounting perfectly for things like youth and birth languages.

      Also you’re just goddamn wrong.

  • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, all those stupid people who want to be kind to neurodivergents, understand that sarcasm is a tonal change which can’t be read in text, or don’t want their comments to give quarter to shitty people /s

    Maybe don’t call people stupid when all you’re doing is whining about how language changes, a thing that languages do. It’s kind of… telling on yourself, ya know?