• IBNobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Part of me thinks that it’s not a consumer facing choice but one of cost savings. I bet they have to pay a licensing fee to continue using Denuvo.

    • visor841@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that’s exactly right. I think there is a one-time cost they could pay, but it’s a lot more, so they just didn’t bother.

    • lorty@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And since the objective is to “protect” release sales, taking it out a few months later makes sense.

    • Haru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Has to be. There’s always going to be a point in a games post-release lifecycle where the cost is just not worth it anymore. Shame these decisions always seem to be based on cost and not what’s right for the consumer.