• SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Jeez, well, there are SO GODDAMN MANY parking lots, I think that we could have a little bit of everything: housing, gardens, small businesses, parks, nature, et cetera. My answer is, then, “whatever the local community currently lacks.”

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what land use planning is in /c/[email protected] is about. Consultation ins an integral part of deciding what to do with a development after it’s finished. Not all land uses necessarily need to support wildlife habitat or ecosystem redevelopment.

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never understood the huge parking lots in the malls near where I grew up. I always thought “why not put in a garage?” It would use a 1/4 of the ground space and keep the same amount of parking and would leave room for more stores. But I like the idea of wildlife sanctuaries/parks replacing parking lots more than stores.

    • Enma Ai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Parking garages are expensive compared to lots.

      The mall probably also is in bumfuck nowhwre, meaning Therese bear unlimited space for other shops and their own parking lots

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d rather delete them than replace them. Move everything closer together again. But you can’t reverse time, so homes and parks are probably the best options. Businesses, museums… schools if feasible.

    • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      God I would love to see a network of tiny walkable neighborhoods connected by reliable public transit in place of the fields of asphalt we have now

  • Rottcodd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty much anything else really - trees, gardens, parks, playgrounds, sports fields, markets, plazas, housing, business space. Hell - even just an overgrown vacant lot would be better than a parking lot.

    • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the middle of the neighborhood? Can you imagine having to walk to the grocery store across a solar farm? Or having the noise of a wind turbine next to your local cafe?

      If something needs to be there, I would choose parks or community gardens.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, hence “if practical”. Obviously, a wind turbine surrounded by existing multi-story buildings isn’t going to be useful anyway - so this wouldn’t be a good idea for inner city parking lots. But not every parking lot is in a city like that, so it really depends on the specific location. If the building near the parking lot is also defunct (like a lot of shopping malls in the US) then maybe tearing all of it down and putting turbines in the space would make sense.

        For long-term society support we should be adding more power generation where we can, especially low-carbon options. Our need for energy isn’t going down and probably never will. Fortunately, solar and wind have both reached the point where they are the lowest cost/MWh option for power generation (even without government subsidies) so they are often the best choice, and probably more people would be comfortable living near a solar or wind farm than a fission plant.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this is a blue-sky scenario, I’m going with: space dedicated to growing food or producing power (like with solar pv between rows of crops that need some shade). This will call for minimal pathways to access some of the spaces, probably also water lines for irrigation, plus strategically placed keystone trees like oak and some fruit-producers as well

    • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agrivoltaics and multistrata agroforestry are super cool. I know this sub is primarily about sustainable urbanism, but I love me some sustainable pastoralism as well. I want a world with denser cities so we can make way for more nature and sustainable agriculture instead of endless sterile suburbs.

  • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it were up to me? I’d talk to local ecologists/climate scientists along with the local community who would be exposed to and/or utilizing that space and see what they felt was best for their area.