• Dingus93@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        Just seen an advert from CNN via the 1980s on youtube, “invest in this, invest in that, invest in children our most precious natural RESOURCE”

        they are resources to be invested in apparently

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      It’s an insurance thing. If they say no sunscreen they can’t then mix up sunscreens or sunscreen and something else and cause a reaction they would then be liable for.

      I didn’t look into it but I imagine there’s language to make the parent responsible for indelibly labeling the sunscreen with name of student parent and contact info.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 年前

    That read like NotTheOnion at first.

    Why was this ever a thing? I mean, is “It’s because the FDA regulates sunscreen as an over-the-counter drug.” actually still relevant? You can’t just buy sunscreen in a supermarket in the US? Or is this only in regards to children?

  • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    Unfortunately, a big reason for this is that not only is sunscreen not usually used daily outside of going to the pool or the beach by most Americans, sunscreen is regulated and classified as an over the counter drug and schools legally have to treat them the same way unless a specification is made like it is in this case.

    Also, A lot of younger Americans are slowly but surely adopting daily sunscreen especially because it’s trendy on tiktok. American sunscreen sucks and hasn’t had a new sunscreen chemical approved for market use in nearly 30 years due the drug regulations. America’s suncreens are quite literally worse than most other countries sunscreens which is a big factor why people don’t use them daily.

    Ninja edit: I know this first hand because I take medication that causes me to burn easily, as well as have photosensitive skin conditions and it was painful to be allowed sunscreen on school grounds… in high school. Similar nonsense of having to get a doctors note to opt out of milk with the school lunch due to lactose intolerance.

      • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        From your name, I’m gonna assume you’re American as well.

        The reason why it sucks both in my opinion (as well as clinically) is because the only “safe” broad spectrum sunscreens in the US that don’t rapidly degrade are titanium dioxide/zinc oxide. Those chemicals in chemical based sunscreens that make them have that distinct smell are more than 20 years old and are highly unstable chemicals that rapidly degrade as soon as they exposed to sunlight. The protection you get rapidly deteriorates, so reapplication is extra important and even then it’s not likely with those chemicals you get a full broad spectrum coverage. There’s two main wavelengths of UV that sunscreen has to target, UVB (rays that burn you) and UVA (rays that age you), both contribute to skin cancer. American chemical sunscreens only protect against so much UVA. The most effective sunscreen in the US right now is mineral based or mineral chemical mixed.

        The sunscreen agents around the world, especially in Japan and Korea and Europe are the most effective and feel like light lotion with lower rates of irritation and higher UV protection. Australian and Kiwi sunscreens are the most heavy duty in the world with the highest regulation. But you can’t legally sell these sunscreens in the US, as they contain chemicals that have been stuck in the over the counter drug approval limbo for decades. You can technically import them, but it’s not really legal to and American stores aside from specific stores that import from Europe or Asia don’t sell them. People with extreme photosensitive conditions that live near Canada often go to Canada and buy tons of sunscreen just to ship it back to themselves.

        It’s a mess. The bureaucratic hell isn’t moving either. As someone who’s not only at high risk of skin cancer but living with a photosensitive medical condition, it’s deeply infuriating.

        For a list of sunscreen agents that clearly separate US and the worlds, check here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunscreen

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          Got to wonder who’s making enough money off of shitty sunscreen sales to ensure no competition get approved (can’t think of any other reason this is the case for you Americans, other than corruption)…

          • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            I don’t even think it’s corruption, it’s likely just a ton of bureaucracy completely fucking shit up. The FDA is completely busted in the way how the approve and manage things.

      • gwildors_gill_slits@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        The Neutrogena ultra mist spray is really good. It goes on clear, isn’t greasy and the high SPF ones work exceptionally well. I’ve bought it in the US at a CVS before and didn’t have to get it over the counter…but maybe that’s only a thing in some states?

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 年前

          Over the counter doesn’t actually always refer literally to over the counter. I’d consider a non prescribed medical item purchased from a cvs as over the counter, even if you don’t have to ask a pharmacist for it

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        Way to miss the point.

        “Why do you complain because you can’t afford to eat three meals a day? Food makes me fat.”

  • gelberhut@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 年前

    Meanwhile in the Netherlands there is a government supported program to explain children why suncream is a must to use to reduce cancer risk. They even offer it for free or so.

    • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 年前

      I posted it in a comment in this post, but it’s likely because sunscreen in the US is classified and treated as an over the counter drug.

        • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          You do if you are a minor in school and intend on bringing it to school. You will have to store it in the nurses office as well to prevent it from being “shared.” It’s as absurd as it sounds, and this policy has been applied to inhalers and other prescription medications that should be on person as well and has caused deaths as a result. Cough drops are considered over the counter as well. It also applies to pain medication.

          High school girls getting caught giving each other paracetamol/tylenol for period pain and being suspended as a result isn’t an isolated thing either.

  • visnae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 年前

    Wow, this makes me so sad. Wtf why would the state have anything to do with it? Why wouldn’t the laws protect the people?

    • Dingus93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      If i had to guess, its to stop parents potentially suing school boards, some foresight that didnt come to fruition maybe

      Edit: someone explained in the comments, classifeid as an over the counter drug for some reason