The title comes from the article, but I agree with some of these changes. It’s making for an engaging show that also feels modern.
I’m sorry but the show has only the name of the books and has very little to do with them…
I’m ok with Salvor Hardin being a woman, I’m not ok with her being an action hero with guns while in the book the dude had a motto which was “violence is the last refuge of incompetents” and was a master of talking.
There’s also the bit where we have at least two “universe’s most special boy/girl” characters upon whom everything hinges repeatedly when the entire point kf the psycho-history concept is that major events like that happen one way or another regardless of the specific details.
But Hari Seldon is being very clear that those characters are wrecking his psychohistorical predictions by being like that. It’s perfectly fine, IMO, for psychohistory to have not been as complete and omnipotent as Seldon initially thought it was. It’d be kind of annoying if it was, frankly.
That flaw turned out to be present in the books too, BTW. The Mule was the universe’s most special boy in there, the show’s just added two extra ones to the mix on the protagonist side.
Exactly. Anybody like the Mule absolutely wreaks havoc.
And he even account for situations like that with a backup plan.
The entire point is that he can predict the overall movement of mankind and with it be specific to some events and some times.
So any one person who everything hinges on just undoes the entire psychohistory.
On the flip side… in the end the books show that even if you’re as good as Hari Sheldon that the universe has a way to randomly throwing wrenches in the works.
I hated the Mule in the books. Wrecked the books from that point on in my opinion. But, loved everything in foundation before that.
Having a category of entity that wasn’t considered in the base assumptions show up and throw a spanner in the works is consistentnwith the theme.
Having a singularity or error which needs correcting works.
Having the same people be the crux of every crisis is incredibly grating.
They also done my boy Daneel real dirty.
I haven’t seen it yet. Please tell me they didn’t do something stupid as if he doesn’t play a part in this and many other stories in the universe?
Also, “the entirety of psychohistory and the Foundation hinges on us storming X place with guns and explosives in the next fifteen minutes!”
Ugh. Yuck. Hard pass. Go home, Goyer, you’re drunk (on the aroma of your own emissions).
That is in the books too. It’s called a “Seldon crisis”, where the Foundation has only one possible way forward as means of keeping it close to the original plan.
Which would be fine if the magic pixie dream girl wasn’t insufferable as hell and had a terrible actress.
The needed the mystery to follow Gaal without her being in the story, just a legend they searched the galaxy for.
You say that yet in reality, psychohistory dictates that they WILL be the universes most special people. They aren’t mutually exclusive, they’re patiently entwined. Not even getting into the latter books and how that shows the truth of it.
I’m OK with salvor because she’s an OK character. That red monk girl is really starting to grow on me.
I am very much NOT OK with anything having to do with Gaal, because she seems like a terrible character with a terrible actress.
Haven’t seen last night but last week was great specifically because it had 0 Gaal.
Brother Constant is the most engaging character on the show now, and yeah Gaal’s a bummer
Gaal: “I hate you, Hari, I don’t trust you, you ruined my life, I’m locking you in this computer and not doing anything you say!”
Also Gaal: “Choke me harder, Daddy Seldon!”
I don’t believe those are quotes, the first one might be paraphrase, but I can’t believe the second one is.
2x03, paraphrased, but surprisingly fitting.
Edit: my bad, think it’s 2x02.
Omfg I just spit out my coffee.
I’m not normally triggered by characters like that, but I realized I liked the 2nd half of s1 a lot more because she finally stfu.
Her voice is beyond grating, her reactions don’t seem to match her environment, shes a genius/take charge woman who is always crying because shes helpless, and even beyond that she makes me want to stop watching and I don’t know why I hate her so much.
The show has nothing to do with Asimov’s books. They are just using Asimov’s name for marketing.
Yes. This video adaptation is disgusting.
I loved his books. I can imagine hollywood making a horrible adaptation with irrelevant B plots or w/e and romance. But what did they really change? I’d rather not waste my time trying to watch it.
Video adaptation has literally no relation to the books at all. It’s just some random crap without any meaning.
I’ve only really heard negative opinions about this show but the budget and special effects actually look beautiful. What’s the consensus here on the show? I actually have never actually read the books as reference.
Its like… actively bad.
The only parts I have actually found engaging enough to watch are the parts centered around the emperor. Unfortunately, everything to do with Hari Seldon and Salvor Hardin so far is at best kinda inconsequential, and at worst so cringingly over-acted and poorly written that I genuinely cannot understand how it got past focus groups.
Not to mention, there is SO. MUCH. Expository narration… I guess the writers didn’t get the memo about “show, don’t tell”.
Not very good. It’s a mess to follow.
deleted by creator
It’s a horrible show. Don’t waste your money on it.
I could not make it past the first season. It’s all looks and no content. They drag out unnecessary bits, mess up the narrative of the original material to make it more “tv friendly”.
I’d put it on the same shelf as Amazon’s “The Expanse”. If you like that, maybe foundation is also your cup of tea. Personally I’m not into either.
I love the Expanse, but I hate Foundation. Has nothing to do with the books. If they want to make something different, they should call it something different.
I think the show is worth watching for sure. The effects are top notch and when they are telling The Empire side of the storyline it can be pretty entertaining.
Show is ok if you don’t know anything about the books. The usual action sci-fi stuff with good special effects.
Would you recommend reading the book first before going into the show?
That will only harm your enjoyment of the show, because they share so little.
I’m not the person you wrote to but I recommend reading the books and not watching the show at all.
deleted by creator
it really depends, LOTR movies made significant changes but I still love it even if it’s not 100% like the books.
Then there’s World War Z where all they did was use the title and some loosely based details. Still enjoyable but not a huge fan.
Then there’s I Am Legend which I didn’t like at all as it didn’t match with the actual point of the story (the alternate ending wasn’t bad though but still left the bad taste in my mouth from the original ending).
Thinking of doing exactly that. Watch the show and then enjoy the books .
The Expanse is an interesting case of book-to-TV adaptation. The authors for the books were fairly involved with the TV series, and, in some ways, it’s their retelling of the main story with some changes that streamlined things for the visual medium. The main things have to do with the consolidation of several characters (e.g., most prominently TV Drummer is an amalgam of three or four different people from the books), and the early introduction of some other ones (e.g., Avasarala and Draper) (though, on the flip side, because of the way actors contracts work, these characters were given make-work arcs in some seasons because they don’t appear during the corresponding books). These changes generally made sense and were pretty well done.
Anyway, the books are excellent. The TV series is excellent.
Note that the last three books were not adapted for TV, though there was some set up that will eventually lead into those books. One logistical trick is that the last three take places some 30 years after the first six, so there’s a matter of the actors’ ages. But the TV series ended very well. You want more, but the main plot lines dominating the first six books were tied up.
It really is beautiful. I’d call it the most cinematic show on the air right now. It takes paying attention to follow, but the story has been satisfying so far. The acting is excellent. I recommend it, but you have to invest yourself in keeping track of what’s going on.
I had similar problems with Rings of Power, absolutely stunning visuals, crap story and absolutely unfaithful to their original work.
I grew up on the books and I’m loving this show. First season is more about set up but season two slaps hard so far. I legit can’t wait for each new episode, whereas first season was more of a passive curiosity about where they went with it.
Imho, don’t even pay attention to the hate. Most of it is from book readers and if you haven’t read them it literally does not matter.
I never read the book/books(?), thought the first season was cool. Seems like everyone who read the book hates it.
I thought it was interesting, visually appealing, and I pretty much binged the whole first season.
It doesn’t have even the vaguest resemblance to the books. They could have created their own show, but instead somehow are selling it as Foundation.
There’s an interesting story about a guy who wrote a Hollywood script for a movie where a murder has been committed and the suspects are robots. He got told to convert it to an adaptation of I Robot, so he jammed in a few bits about the 3 laws. Then they brought in Will Smith and that changed the flavor entirely into a Will Smith cop movie. And that’s how the most recent I Robot movie got made. It literally was another story.
I haven’t read the books but the show is good scifi imo. The actors are solid and the story is really intriguing.
Not having read the books, I’m enjoying the show very much and since The Expanse was shitcanned, this is my favorite SciFi being produced every year now. The production value is off the charts, it’s excellent science fiction.
I liked the books back when I read them. But sometimes it was tough work keeping on reading, because p.e. tech references would not translate well to nowadays, and from the social structure depicted they really showed their age. Which for me works with p.e. Heinlein, but not with Asimov and Foundation.
I try to see the series not as adaption of the books, but completely apart from them. And then I have to agree with the author and with OP, its modern, engaging and really well made.
Old school scifi always has issues with weird tech hangups just throwing wrenches into huge foundational aspects of highly advanced civilizations. Thankfully most of them can be handwaved away.
Anyone expecting a very internal monologue driven book series to be translated well into the screen is just green though lol.
Remember when everyone complained about Ender’s Game which was so similar with blatant storytelling in character thought? Versus the reality of what’s being show in universe to a 3rd party observer? I can name very few internal monologue driven movies, let alone tv series that did well. I can’t name a single one off the top of my head. Maybe Sin City and that’s stretching.
Old school scifi always has issues with weird tech hangups just throwing wrenches into huge foundational aspects of highly advanced civilizations. Thankfully most of them can be handwaved away.
This is something that Dune handles really well precisely because it writes a lot of the tech out of the setting. “Thinking machines” are gone and banned, guns don’t work against shields, lasers are banned because of their (nuclear) interaction with shields. Even communications are largely handled by couriers. The tech is deliberately written to be at a level where it doesn’t take convenience or deux ex machina for certain situations to occur.
Anyone expecting a very internal monologue driven book series to be translated well into the screen is just green though lol.
I thought Denix Villeneuve’s adaptation of Dune handled this incredibly well when Paul and Jessica used sign language to communicate while they were tied up. In the book, that entire section is told through their internal monologues and their expectations of what the other would be thinking, so translating that to sign language for the screen was clever. I’m very curious to see how the internal-monologue-heavy second half of the book will fare, though.
The banned laser guns in Dune always struck me as a funny choice. If everyone uses shields and laser guns cause them to explode like nukes… those aren’t very good shields are they? And the Harkonnens are going to respect a ban? The Fremen could have used one laser to nuke the Harkonnens but they didn’t because of a ban?
I wish he just hadn’t mentioned lasers at all. Not sure why he felt he had to.
Yes, correct. I think what made reading the books difficult for me, though - and that was many years ago, not sure if I remember correctly - was that strong “atomic” reference in everything tech related, overused. Yes, at the time of writing this was cutting edge, but for me when reading was extremely difficult to translate/take seriously. It killed the immersion.
Can’t describe it better, but did not have that effect at all wit Asimov’s contemporaries.
I never thought of Sin City being different in that way. But it is. Whole sections are just the current character talking to themselves.
Ender’s Game was bad because they changed the overall internal conflict from one of horror at making the ‘necessary’ decisions to a ‘yay we beat the bugs’ ending of generic sci fi. Yeah, internal dialogue is hard to adapt, but when the core part of the book is changed it should be an interesting contrast like in Starship Troopers.
I miss when Hollywood had original ideas
I am really enjoying the second season.
