• Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I love you, English as my second language, but you cray cray and I ain’t doing all of that.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’m Ojibway/Cree from northern Ontario in Canada

    In English - a group of moose is just ‘a group of moose’ … as far as I know, I’ve never heard of meese or mooses … or else people just say two moose, three moose, four moose, etc.

    In Ojibway/Cree - one moose is ‘moose’, because moose is an indigenous word … a group of moose in my language is MOOSUK

    • dave@hal9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Very interesting, thanks for sharing. Just curious, is -uk just a general suffix to make anything plural, or this is just a one off thing here?

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yes it is for most words.

        Goose is niska … the plural is niskuk

        Beaver is amisk… the plural is amiskuk

        It’s not a hard rule but it applies to many things, objects and animals.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    Who decides stuff like this? Who’s like “hmm, yeah a group of owls is definitely a parliament”

  • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t know if it is still in print but there is a book that is a collection of collective nouns. The book is called An Exaltation of Larks by James Lipton.

    It is the same James Lipton who hosts the Inside the Actors Studio.