• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have you ever had a solid chocolate bunny? They make them, and they are terrible. You can’t even bite off pieces because it’s too thick. You have to gnaw on the edges and try not to drool all over it so you can save the uneaten parts for later. That, or use a knife to shave off pieces onto a plate and the eat it with a spoon, like a sociopath.

    Chocolate is better in thin cross sections.

    This has nothing to do with atheism or religion. I just want everyone to have realistic expectations should they ever discover the solid bunny and think they have found ambrosia.

    • wrath-sedan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Could not agree more that the hollow bunny is the superior chocolate eating experience, quality over quantity

    • Ertebolle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They could fill it with ganache or something. But admittedly that’s messy and probably also reduces the shelf life.

    • BionicHippo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is so well written and I feel the same way about chocolate bunnies.

      I made the mistake of freezing a solid chocolate bunny once. I tried to eat it right out of the freezer. It felt like trying to chew a chocolate rock.

  • db2@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    And this one could have been written by CS Lewis himself, a believer who got mad at his deity for like five minutes and thought that made him atheist.

  • apis@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Idk but that bunny is too thick already, so y’all keep those gods imaginary tyvm or there’s gonna be gnawing & drooling & eventually acceptance followed by the melting down of cocoa-based graven images.

    Or was it craven?

    Idk.