• MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    4 months ago

    Pure speculation here, but my secret to getting the best protection from my own bodyguards is that I’m pretty rarely an asshole to people who work for me.

    Also, I don’t have very many bodyguards. Because I’m not important. So my experience may not be relevant.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      My wild-ass guess here is that some filtering effect is in play. Secret service people that can perform at that level, with a clean enough background, can absolutely move on to a better (and less lethal) job if they want1. This is a position where “will you take a bullet for this president?” is absolutely front-and-center for the interview process. Also, it doesn’t take a brainiac to see that this President has a tendency to attract violence, which is not ideal for anyone with that security detail. So, trump got the best security he could possibly get which, due to his repugnant personality, are probably not the best in the business.

      1 “Our new company head of security is former Secret Service, can you believe it?”

  • Ack@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t get it, I assume it has something to do with the Trump assassination attempt. Did the secret service not look up a slope or something?

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      123
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They apparently decided not to secure the roof that the assassin ended up shooting from because it was sloped and so they were afraid.

      I’m not making that up.

      “That building in particular has a sloped roof, at its highest point. And so, there’s a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn’t want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside,” [U.S. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle] said.

      She’s also trying to throw the local cops under the bus.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Idk that saying “they didn’t do their jobs” when they didn’t do their jobs is really throwing them under the bus. SS counts on local law enforcement to do things, it’s just a fact.

        Ignoring that one of their snipers saw him pull out a rangefinder though…

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          If you’re the Secret Service, you rely on small-town cops to prevent a sniper from shooting Trump, and those small-town cops don’t do that very well, that’s your fault not theirs.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think you have an unrealistic expectation of the size and funding of the SS, but they also clearly have unrealistic expectations of the competency of cops (any) so maybe that’s fair anyways.

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ignoring that one of their snipers saw him pull out a rangefinder though…

          Well just seeing that probably shouldn’t be enough to use lethal force. At that point he’s effectively just a guy looking through binoculars or a monocular.

          • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Then you ought to have someone remove him nonviolently, just to make sure he’s not a threat. Maybe send a cop up there to instruct him to get down?

            Cop is threatened with a gun

            Okay at that point you’d expect a radio call to go out “Person on X roof just threatened a Law Enforcement officer with a gun” which I’d consider license to fire.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            You’d think the counter-sniper would maybe keep his sights on the guy pulling out sniper equipment.

            Especially when he pulls out a fucking rifle.

      • Ack@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 months ago

        Wow. That’s… I don’t even know. Funny? Sad? Ridiculous? Maybe all of the above.

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s an obvious flaw in Secret Service protocol. If there is nothing in protocol that requires securing that roof then it’s gaurenteed that there are many other flaws that can be exploited.

      • evidences@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That building in particular has a sloped roof, at its highest point. And so, there’s a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn’t want to put somebody up on a sloped roof.

        Uhh what the hell, the snipers that took the dude out were on a sloped roof behind the stage? Do they have a one sloped roof per venue rule?

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Forget the building. I want to know how the shooter even got close with a gun? I would not be shocked that Trump refused to allow metal detectors at the entrances.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 months ago

    Are we all sure the SS was putting in 110% that day?

    I get it - they’re pros - but hear me out : Trump.