• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago
        1. There are two choices in the 2020 election. No third party stands a ghost of a chance of winning. No, not even if the 30,000 people you can reach on Lemmy all vote for Timothy Greenparty.
        2. A Trump victory in 2024 would not only be just as bad if not worse for the citizens of Gaza than Harris would, but also pose an existential threat to a large number of vulnerable Americans (trans people, immigrants, women seeking abortions).
        3. Given the margins of victory in 2016 and 2020, Kamala might not win if leftists don’t vote for her.

        I’d like to focus my counterargument. Which of these three statements do you disagree with?

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think you mean the 2024 election in the first point.

          That said, just for my understanding, would Harris alienate a different segment of voters if she went hard against Israel’s genocide? Is her support for Israel out of political compromise or personal conviction?

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Representatives should not govern by personal conviction. They have mandates. It’s their job to reconcile their personal beliefs with the needs of the people. Just because a Christian is in the white house it should not mean we all have to goto mass.

            Political compromise is what Gaza supporters are asking for.

            Now go ahead and tell everyone they, “support genocide.” Since that’s what you wanted all along.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          No third party stands a ghost of a chance of winning.

          I live in a blue state, so by that same logic my vote for Harris would be wasted. She’ll win my state whether I vote for her or not, so I might as well vote for a third party. At least that way, I can help the Greens get to that crucial 5% we need for funding.

          Given the margins of victory in 2016 and 2020, Kamala might not win if leftists don’t vote for her.

          Guess she better focus on winning over leftists, then.

          Why do Democrats always act like it’s the voters’ responsibility to get their candidates elected, instead of their candidates’ responsibility to win over voters?

          If Harris wants those votes, then she should tell Israel to move to a ceasefire or she’ll enact an arms embargo. Quit giving Israel money! Simple as.

    • aleph@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The post title seems to be satirizing a common argument between factions on the left / centre-left. It can generally apply to various issues (say, universal health care or police reform) but US support for Israel is the current point of contention.

      One side is advocating just to make sure Kamala gets the presidency and Trump is defeated, after which point (they say) she can be pressured to ‘move left’ on the subject of Israel, which would mean to enforce an arms embargo on Netanyahu in order to put a halt to the killing in Gaza.

      The other side (which is the position being advocated by this meme) are saying no, it doesn’t work like that with Democrats – they profess to be in favor of change and progressive values but once in power, they’ll be under the boot of big money donors and lobbyists in Washington. If you want to pressure on Kamala on Israel (they say) the time to do it is now, while she’s desperate to get elected.

      • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s the far right and centre right. There is no left major political party.

        But yes electing more progressive government shifts the Overton window and gets us closer to leftism.

    • 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      But why? It look more like a fascist telling everyone he’s not a fascist but a “concerned citizen” who deeply cares about the “common people”. Everyone knows, he’s a fascist but they like the momentum he gives their party and they fall for the illusion, that he can be controlled once he’s in office.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No, we’ll push the next candidates further left.

    The “I want everything my way right now” impulse needs to go die in a dark lonely hole.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s extremely childish and they tell themselves how smart they are. The irony is completely lost on them.

  • einlander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    But the path to vegetarianism is long and difficult. Some may be eaten, but that’s in the name of progress.