https://www.fairphone.com/en/2024/09/04/how-much-ram-does-your-smartphone-need/
Couldn’t find another decent link in that wasn’t written in Dutch, but you’ll find it at the bottom of the story.
Besides the storage and RAM, nothing else has changed.
Moreover the orginal 256/8 model got a 10% price cut and is now “only” 630 €
https://social.fairphone.community/@WeAreFairphone/113078784244931992
Would be nice to have the option of a Fairphone with flagship specs, but that’s probably not going to happen until Qualcomm officially supports mainline Linux.
Fairphone is garbage.
Source: I’m typing this on one
edit: Sorry, didn’t realize this was a FP community. I stand by my words though
Well, that might go a little far, but they need to step up their game when it comes to software: that’s where they currently lacking. Too many bugs, bad optimization and unpolished designs. That’s why mine is now my secondary device, which i probably want to use to try out custom ROMs. Hope they find a way to improve their software team (better and more developers, perhaps more colabs with Nixos, Graphene etc.)
Could you ellaborate?
I have an FP3 and I’m pretty happy with my device - previously owned a Galaxy S5 (the only lost features are the HRM and amoled display😓)
What I do find garbage though is what Google continues to do with Android…
It’s a bad phone with tons of feel-good marketing. It’ll end up on a landfill like any other phone.
The design and build quality of the device are bad. Sharp edges that feel so unfinished. The components, like the fingerprint sensor, are beyond unreliable. The camera is absolutely shit. Yeah, great, I can replace parts - against exactly the same garbage they put in at the factory.
Android Auto reliably is a frustrating experience in any car I tried. You have to manually adjust the USB mode, or wait minutes for the phone to connect, every single time you plug in. Sometimes I take a quick stop and the car/phone will absolutely refuse to cooperate with each other. Just connection errors. You reboot the phone, still the same shit. You stop the car, get out, lock it, unlock it, get back in, connect phone, change USB mode, connection error… You give up, the next day it just works again. I keep an old OnePlus in the car now. It has zero of these issues. You plug it in, 100% of the time AA comes up instantly. Fairphone is a waste of time in this regard.
They have no ARKit certification, which I haven’t even experienced ever before. You don’t need it until you need it.
I also heard the 3 was designed better, but I would never buy another Fairphone after owning the 4. It is the worst smartphone I have ever owned, and I actively hate it every single day. I bought it, because I wanted something that’ll last me a long time, and break buying new devices all time. No smartphone I have ever owned created such a massive motivation to get a replacement.
I agree, to some level at least. It is not good enough in its current state as my daily driver, but i do believe the hardware is good. Not €700 good (more like 300 good, if we don’t talk about ‘fair’ products). If the software was better, i would’ve used it as my daily driver.
I don’t care about the fingerprintreader and camera for example (but i do understand that it is a dealbreaker for some). I think the camera is actually pretty good (again, not €700 good, might be somewhat software related). I think the vibrationmotor and battery are the things that are the worst on the FP5.
I just wished they focused on software and better new parts for once, instead of earsbuds, new versions of phones etc. They can improve what is already there, for the most part…
I wished i tried out the FP4 first, because for now it is 700 not very well spent. Hope that can change in the future.
Fair. But I will never retreat from my stance on the FP4 fingerprint sensor. Several times these few cents worth of technology stood between me and important financial transactions, to a degree where my banking apps got locked and required unlocking operations involving having a letter sent to me via snail mail. Today, I have all biometric stuff disabled on the phone. Not because I’m paranoid, but because this phone made it an unbearable annoyance, instead of the convenience it should be.
I had other smartphones before that had the sensor under the screen, and this worked flawlessly for years. The garbage sensor they used in the FP4 is the worst fingerprint sensor I’ve used in the past two decades. It is literally pure garbage.
As you already mentioned, the device is insanely overpriced. At every single corner, you feel how they cut even the tiniest bit of cost to increase revenue. It is a dishonest device from a dishonest company.
I disagree on most points :D
I would be most interested on how you think they are dishonest? I bought the fairphone knowing fully well it will NOT be the best bang for the buck.
I bought it because
It has 5 years of waranty
Easily replacable battery (and other parts)
Somewhat sustainable manufacturing techniques
And not as much sweat shop in it as the rest
Edit: formating
The idea that the phone was made purely in manufacturing processes where you could have a good conscience is ridiculous. Like any similar greenwashing strategy, it relies on indirection and fragmentation. You have no way to validate their claims other than some badges they bought from eco licensing companies.
The warranty is worth nothing. At the launch of the phone it was already crystal clear that no security updates would be released for the SoC of the phone after 2 years. So you get 3 more years of cute Android UI on a phone that’s potentially insecure. They knew this when they designed and marketed the phone!
I have not yet replaced my battery, but I remember thinking this would be a win. This phone is a piece of shit. Why would I ever want to prolong this suffering?
These are pretty fair points I’d say
I haven’t used the FP4 personally so can’t really comment on that, but a lot of the community who owned the 3 weren’t too keen on the 4 the last time I was on their forums. Most of that was due to the software issues you mentioned, as well as the removal of the 3.5mm jack.
The improved GM1 isocell rear camera on the 3+ is pretty good for what it is, but on the software side there’s practically no optimization there at all. In full manual with OpenCamera I can take better pictures than my iPhone 13 - lack of HDR (camera hardware supports it, no software implementation) and OIS aside. Others have used the Google Camera app on auto and they’re very happy with what they get, I’m personally not too keen on the overprocessed look that some environments can exhibit though.
Ever since the leadership changes and designer departure following the 3+ release, a few mistakes have been made - unrepairable fairbuds being the worst one IMO!! Plastic sustainability of those buds aside, the three tiny unreplaceable batteries will be a one way ticket to the landfill once they’re worn out.
Personally I’m hoping they develop a true successor to the FP3, really like the feel of this device
I have an FP4 and I love it. I only ever have problems with the fingerprint sensor when my hands are dirty or overly sweaty. The camera works rather well to be honest, but I did replace the app with the Googled one.
I can’t speak to Android Auto, 'cause I’ve never used it, and don’t know what ARKit is. I do heavily use Google (and Organic) Maps though, and I find the accuracy of both the GPS and compass to be quite good.
Honestly, I generally find the hardware to be pretty solid and have been using it since the FP4 was released without issue. I connect it to my computer to transfer Very Large Files all the time, and regularly push a lot of data through the wifi.
I’ve been abusing the shit out of the battery though, so I just ordered a replacement one. Something most phones still can’t do. It’s Fairphone’s killer feature in my book.
I’m not posting this to invalidate your experience, just to demonstrate that there are others who feel differently.
ARKit is what allows you to use augmented reality features in certain apps. It’s niche, but it’s rare not to be available.
I thought for the longest time that the fingerprint sensor is right when it complains that I should clean it. Have you ever tried to clean it by rubbing it? Causing it to lock down because it interpreted the input as a quick series of invalid fingerprints? Because that’s what kept happening to me. After several times of this happening, the next time I just rebooted the device. After reboot, it unlocked on the first try, without me having to clean or dry anything.
When you just wanted to pay a bill, and suddenly you can’t unlock your banking app because of this, it’s quite annoying. Now you need the app password. Okay, let’s pull it out of the password manager. Oh right, you can’t unlock that either now. So let’s enter the 100 characters master key again.
I’m truly happy for every other owner who never went through this 😄
The camera is not terrible, but the missing stabilization frequently leads to blurry images. In low light it’s almost pointless to even try. I was used to better image quality from phones when FP4 was released. They could have done better for the price.
I’m actually glad to hear that you were able to exercise the ability to replace a part. I’m sure others have too. I should put that more into consideration next time I come the subject.
I appreciate you took the time to give a different perspective. So I wanted to provide a bit more context from my experience.
It’s an OK phone. I don’t have any problems with sharp edges, the fingerprint sensor and camera are working well, certainly better than those of the Sony Z5 premium I was using previously.
Really? I thought they were the FrameWork of phones?
As I understand it: Framework is for people who don’t want to sacrifice a great PC for repairability, which comes at a price. Fairphone is for people who want outdated hardware and stock Android in exchange for repairability, at pretty much the same price as a competitive product.
But: Compared to Framework, Fairphone is a pretty small company which tries to create as much of its products as possible in a sustainable manner. And for smartphones, that’s just not super easy or sustainable as a business.
Fairphone doesn’t really targer enthusiasts or the mass market, they are targeting a (sadly) small group of people who care enough about the environment to sacrifice convenience for it.
Wasn’t fairphone originally about being sweatshop-free with the sustainability or repairability claims being afterthoughts? Am I thinking about something else?
Could be. Can’t find anything specific about that atm, but the Fairphone 1 was already highly repairable, even though it wasn’t necessarily modular. So yeah, the repairability thing was probably something they went with as a secondary goal.
I found this iFixit teardown of the Fairphone 1. Doesn’t seem to be too complicated to take appart, but then again, neither were a lot of other phones at the time.
Framework uses high end SOCs. And doesn’t have to write as much code to make it all work ootb. Fairphone has to choose an SOC that will be supported by manufacturer for as long as possible since they’re on the hook for supporting the fairphone for so long. Only SOCs that are supported long term are designed for industrial/enterprise type use
Fairphone should try to get their hands on Google’s SoC and board support package. Perhaps a special deal. That’ll get them long software support without any special SoC engineering. Just improve the high level Android apps and sell parts. This would let them be closer to what Framework is. Framework writes almost no software for their hardware.
Lost me when they dropped the jack. Against e waste but force me to buy dongles or bt headphones?
They can get bent.
dongles or bluetooth
Are you forgetting that usb-c headphones exost or is this on purpose for dramatic effect?
I mean, usb-c headphones work only with usb-c ports…
The whole point of the 3.5mm jack is that it’s ubiquitous. So am I supposed to buy new usb-c headphones instead that can only be used on my new phone and nothing else in my house, etc.?
you can get adapters that are basically just short extension cables for the headphones, the only real issue with not having a 3.5mm jack is that it means you need a fancier solution for charging while listening to music.
The real problem is they took a ubiquitous jack that needed zero dongles no matter where you used it and binned it.
It brought exactly zero solutions (because you could already use bluetooth even if the phone had a jack) and more problems (adapters, can’t charge and listen at the same time, well without yet another adapter, etc.)
I appreciate your input but I don’t understand how people excuse all this. “Just use this adapter and then this” Why? What problem have we solved? IP68 was doable with a jack, etc. Basically people are cheering on companies who did this all for their own bottom line- not for any consumer benefit.
That’s all I need to know. I’m out.
I’ve always been confused as to why Fairphone, a company trying to make ‘greener’ phones and reduce e-waste, doesn’t have headphone jacks on their devices…
It’s for
making more profit by forcing their shitty earbuds on you"susaintability" and waterproofing. (Just ignore the dozens of phones with a headphone jack and IP68 certification)
And here I am, using my chinese phone with 8gb of ram (+8 gb of virtual ram), 128gb of storage, a nice camera and a headphone jack that I bought for $150 three years ago. Works perfectly. I thought fairphone at least comes with root access out of the box, which it apparently doesn’t.
