• simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Definitely AI generated art. If you asked me 3-4 years ago I’d tell you there is no way neural networks would understand how to generate a nice looking image. The fact that high quality AI art is way less expensive computationally than generating text still confuses me. Like, I can generate beautiful 1024x1024 images within seconds but this text generation model needs 20gb of vram? Huh?!

  • burgundymyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The simultaneous nuance and beauty of the art coupled with inability to get hands right. It’s both humorous and chilling.

    • n00b001@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is.

      An ai is such a “different” mind. It may seem like us, it might tick some boxes that we do too, but (like the hands example) there might just be one small thing it does very differently. In the hands example, it doesn’t have much consequence - but as AI has more control over daily life (insurance, route planning, healthcare, political foreign policy, lawmaking) some of these “it’s not human” hand-problems might have far reaching implications for society