• ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is what I love about the fediverse. On the Lemmy side we’ve seen it in action with lemmygrad. Private platforms need moderators to do that, which let’s be real, doesn’t generate enough profit to be worth their time…

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lemmy world just removed their non-discrimination clause and one of the admins is (poorly) justifying it in a thread about it. I wouldn’t cheer quite yet.

      • Yote.zip@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is only a problem because lemmy.world has become one of the centralized hubs for Lemmy, which means that jettisoning them has a larger impact. The failing of lemmy.world is a reminder that we should be intentionally spreading out to smaller instances, that way a bad admin/instance can be cut off without losing much value. Additionally, by lemmy.world/lemmy.ml/etc having such a grip on the core of Lemmy, they are emboldened to make bad changes without fearing consequences.

        • nybble41@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The more users spread out into smaller, more easily censored instances, the more the remaining fragmented bits of the Lemmy ecosystem still talking to each other will turn into echo chambers full of groupthink. This low threshold for defederation is the Fediverse’s greatest weakness. Sure, it’s possible to work around it—but how many separate Lemmy accounts are users expected to create? Even if you have accounts on every instance of note you’d need to manually cross-post messages to each balkanized server and their comment sections wouldn’t be shared—exactly the sort of thing federation was meant to avoid.

          Email, another federated system, has this same weakness. It’s why it’s increasingly difficult to run your own (outgoing) email server which other systems will accept messages from without going through a well-known third party like Google. Especially when trying to push content to a large audience (e.g. mailing lists), which happens to be Lemmy’s core function.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Bluesky is using content addressing to deal with this, although currently it is only built around feeds and not forums. Your profile is truly portable and posts can optionally be retrieved from “mirrors” (one of the CDN-like servers called BGS) so you don’t need to rely on your current hosting server (the account hosts called PDS) to federate with everybody.

        • IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Is lemmy.world having some trouble? If so, good…they banned me early on so I’ve blocked them

          • Yote.zip@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not the All-Keeper of Receipts on this matter and I don’t have a Lemmy.World account, this is just what I’ve gleaned from various posts coming across my timeline. My comment you’re replying to was also meant more to emphasize the strength of decentralization against this kind of behavior, both reactive and proactive, instead of being a shot at Lemmy.World directly.

            That said, from my understanding, there’s a few things they’ve done recently that users are questioning. They’ve changed their TOS/Code of Conduct, dropping some explicit protections for the usual protected classes i.e. gender identity/ethnicity/disability/etc and generally making the rules more unclear than before. The thread here is a brief look into that, and I especially appreciate the post by fiat_lux within it. Note the admin Xilly has responded within and said they would look into adding these things back, but obviously the conspicuous removal of them caused a lot of eyebrow-raising. A couple extra threads about this are here and here

            A user was also recently banned for questioning the TOS, which they report here, and provide an archive.org link to their comments here, since the L.W team wiped their account out when banning them. Their comment seems like a very fair criticism, which the L.W admins supposedly invoked users to provide. This clearly seems like a power-tripping admin taking personal offense and deliberately permabanning and wiping out their account in direct response to the user’s concerns of this exact thing happening, giving the impression of immaturity and laissez-faire enforcement of the rules. Additionally, wiping out a user’s content while banning them is a good way to cover your tracks on the actual ban reason. It’s a good thing archive.org was available to catch this one.

            Speaking of archive.org, L.W has also recently started banning archive.org links and any posts that question that decision, which is discussed here.

            I’m really not invested into this saga so if someone else has more receipts or insight on these situations feel free to add on.

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Totally. I would love to stand up an instance but it’s a little above my tech knowledge and, frankly, I don’t want to have to think about the legal aspects of what happens on it.

          If I ever somehow did it, I would probably not allow photos/videos. Disable downvotes. Things like that.

      • Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Agreed. In order to keep a upvote/downvote based platform from becoming toxic, a lot of good moderation is required. Lemmy.world is definitely not doing that.

            • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I do think they have a lot of similar culture issues, make no mistake. But stormfront was literally a white supremacist website. It was the explicit purpose. I think we’re not quite that bad around here lol

              • Black AOC 2.0@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Stormfront was blatant. .world is a lot more ‘subtle’ and crypto- about it, but make no mistake, the same supremacy lives there. I know what to look for on that charge, I’ve been seeing it and living isolated by it for years now.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hmm, Twitter used to at least try before. Advertisers don’t like Eat Fresh! Running below a nazi tweet. There are at least some market forces keeping them at bay, which is why their social platforms keep failing.

      Nothing Beats communities that are willing to oust bad elements, though

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Bluesky has federation running in a sandbox network and is built to support 3rd party moderation tools both server side, client side, and in the custom feeds. Currently all users are on the main server which isn’t yet federating, though.

      BTW one neat thing about those 3rd party mod tools is that you won’t need to wait for the server owner to act

      • Slow@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Unfortunately, none of the Mastodon applications have a separate button for private messages. Formally, the “Direct messages” button is available in several applications. However, this is a standard input field for all messages where you need to mark with a special icon that you want to send a personal message that only the recipient can view. This is inconvenient and during intensive correspondence you may forget to mark “Only for the addressee” when sending the next message.

        I want a simpler and clearer interface like in the Jerboa or Infinity for Reddit applications. However, no one is engaged in such development. All Mastodon applications are similar to one another to one degree or another.

  • tswiftchair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is there a way to see which instances a Mastodon instance has defederated with? For lemmy instances, for example, you can go to /instances to see a list of other connected and blocked instances.

  • galoisghost@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Depends on the instance. Some have the BlueSky response. Some have the Xitter response.

    Don’t believe me, ask a black Mastodon user.

      • galoisghost@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        No I mean instances like mastodon.world who do ok moderating their own users, but are very poor at moderating the instances that federate with them. So any minority users who joins mastodon.world can still be (and is, I’ve seen it) subject to the worst bigotry on the fediverse.

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m just so tired of watching green mods make the same mistakes. “It’s not my job to weigh in on debates or tell people what to think.” No, but it’s your job to reduce disruption in a community. If someone comes in going “being gay is a choice if you ask me,” they have about 30 seconds to clarify their position or they’re gone from my discord server and generally that won’t do it. We have a lot of LGBT folks who have NO desire to deal with those people in a the little corner of friends we’ve created. That person is not entitled to their time and attention. It is our job to look out for the best interests of all our users, yet we categorically see mods get bogged down by a handful of incredibly disruptive attention seekers/combative personalities that make it shitty for everyone else. It’s so predictable at this point.

          We banned someone a few months ago from our discord who had some of the best insights about gaming I’ve ever seen. The dude was remarkable. But my god he was such a jerk! He kept being such an ass to people who disagreed with him. “That’s just a brain dead take.” “People who like that have no taste so frankly I don’t care what you or they think.” Just constant antagonism that halted all conversation and made people feel like crap. So we booted him! We asked him to stop, he didn’t, and his disruptions just became unwelcome. We didn’t play rules lawyer with him or debate things. We said stop, he didn’t, that was the end of it, and while I miss his insights the community is noticeably better without him.

          Most mods aren’t clueless. They know bigotry is occurring in their communities. Yet they too often just won’t be proactive about it because the behavior doesn’t overtly violate the rules. Don’t let bad actors weaponize your own rules against you!

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Another thing is that some people are loud specifically to drown out other’s voices.

            That’s why true free speech can not be a free-for-all, you must put a dampener on those people and it doesn’t matter how closely they technically follow the rules if they do not follow the spirit and cause the quality and mood to degrade with their presence.

          • Nougat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’ve always thought that people should be able to hotly debate ideas all they want, but as soon as they leave the ideas out and begin disparaging people, good-bye.

            • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Sure but some communities simply don’t want to be debating all the time and some people refuse to accept that lol like my LGBT friends constantly talk about how exhausting it is. Sometimes they just want to talk about a tv show.

              They basically are tired of constantly justifying their existence, even if the questions are genuine/good faith.

                • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yeah that’s kind of what I’m driving at. Some folks truly believe all debate must be allowed everywhere “as long as it’s nice.”

              • onion@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                That’s great but the talk in this thread isn’t about some communities, the demand is that mastodon.world should defederate more.
                I find these opinions kind of antithetical to the whole fediverse idea, if you want a small gated community do your thing, but why should the biggest fediverse instance merrily defederate everything left and right

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s one of the current weaknesses of the fediverse right now. Devs are working on more comprehensive moderation tools, but it’s all under development.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is why, in the case of Mastodon, it’s best to join a smaller instance so it can be more easily moderated.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      There’s a fuck ton of cryptofash on mastodon, and you’ll get absolutely flooded with them if you say the wrong thing. Moderation is quick to snuff out those who overtly act hateful but is completely useless to those who mask their bigotry behind liberal politics.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Masto doesn’t have outright nazis they just have neoliberal fascists, and let me tell you, it has a LOT of them.

  • Lurkerino [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is mastodon good? I use lemmy but as I never used twitter I also never use mastodon so idk if im losing something. I never understood the appeal of twitter.

    • Aku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Just commenting to say I feel the exact same way. I am curious if mastodon is something worth getting into?

      • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It looks like Twitter, feels like Tumblr. Since its not very big, people will post the most raw, vulnerable moments in their life, both good and bad. My feed ping pongs between people learning to use Godot to make their first game ever and proudly sharing their work, to a anarchist TTRPG dev struggling with medical bills in the USian Healthcare hellscape. I love it. I am not looking forward to whenever it blows up in popularity.

        • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          i feel like it may never. i think lemmy has the highest probability of getting ‘big’ due to its community centered aspect.

    • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I would describe it as “what if Tumblr decided to have the layout of Twitter?” The interface looks and feels like Twitter, but since there’s no algorithm people will post the most raw shit. My feed is one part guinea pig videos, one part OSR Dnd memes, one part people learning to code and sharing their early janky work with pride, and one part entirely from one queer anarchist TTRPG dev struggling with medical bills and the fucked USian Healthcare system.

      The most trouble you’ll have is deciding which instance to settle down in. Self-hosting is really not reasonable for Mastodon, since the local feed is pretty important.

  • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I dont particularly care for the format. I never liked using Twitter(xitter).

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Mastodon is a very feels good sanitized version of what is going on in the world right now.