PopBobert@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoLight-based “LiFi” is stunningly fast, notably fragile—and now standardizedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1180arrow-down119file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1161arrow-down1external-linkLight-based “LiFi” is stunningly fast, notably fragile—and now standardizedarstechnica.comPopBobert@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square25fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareRaltoid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoThe speed claim isn’t true, it’s ~150mbs being offered, and it doesn’t work if the air is bit dusty or foggy. So TL;DR: It’s slower, more unstable and more expensive than already available directional microwave “wifi” antennas that can do 10gbit.
The speed claim isn’t true, it’s ~150mbs being offered, and it doesn’t work if the air is bit dusty or foggy.
So TL;DR: It’s slower, more unstable and more expensive than already available directional microwave “wifi” antennas that can do 10gbit.