I mean, I love Star Trek, but I love it because it has heart unlike most other scifi, not because it is “smarter” than other scifi. 99% of other scifi shows/movies spend all their time trying to be “smart” about how war will mechanically work in space or the far future… and completely bungle representing the human condition with any degree of heart or depth.
Star trek can be as dumb as it wants, it will always be better than 99% of other scifi just for the reason that it has heart and isn’t obsessed with technology for technologies sake.
I mean… look at the current crop of techbros who watch dystopian scifi’s and think “this looks COOOOL, lets make that!”, it really speaks to how flawed most scifi is at actually engaging with humanity beyond a superficial, aesthetic or “big picture ideas” level.
Red Dwarf from this article does look like it has heart too though, I will definitely have to give it a try.
Red Dwarf is an awesome show with lots of heart. And don’t be fooled, its also got tons of dumb (and hilarious) humor in it as well.
You have to be smart to use dumb humour correctly.
Well said!
Red Dwarf is great - series 2-6 were its peak for me. It played with sci-fi concepts in an intelligent way and the humour came from the people.
It was originally pitched as ‘The Odd Couple in Space’ I believe if that gives you a feeling for the dynamics between the main 2 characters, a stuck up deadpan snarker and a slobbish loveable rogue
I kept hearing about Red Dwarf and gave it a try. It’s quirky and goofy at times, but endearing. The special effects suck and they know it. The nice thing since it’s a British show, there’s not a ton of them in relation to its age. Only 74 since it began in 1988!
I think that one is the most significant differences between the shows is illustrated by how they handle escalating a yellow alert to a red alert. Star Trek does so almost unthinkingly, but in Red Dwarf Kryten first questions whether it is the right choice with “Sir, are you absolutely sure? It does mean changing the bulb.”
Smeg off Rimmer!
If only the red dwarf writers hadn’t split up. It’s been a shadow of itself since then :(
A white hole?
So what is it?
Only joking.
Chicken vindaloo for breakfast. The cat. Rimmer. This show is hilarious, I like it so much.
I’ve rewatched Red Dwarf so many times, very fun show. I’ve watched all of TNG but I’ve never been all that interested in star trek though.
Loved this show when I was a kid
Star Trek is smart now?
On the one hand you have TNGepisodes like Damok, Inner Light, DS9: Duet, etc.
Then there’s episodes which defy any attempts to categorize them, like Threshold.
Or Time’s Arrow!
You’re right, there are several smart episodes, but on average Red Dwarf is way smarter.
Always has been.
Ehhhh… the Abrams movies were decidedly un-smart.
Before that, though, I’d agree.
The TNG movies were starting to suffer from Action Movie Syndrome before then, alas. The curse of having a big budget these days is that you get lots of focus groups meddling to try and give the movie “broader appeal.” Plus, IIRC Patrick Stewart was also starting to gain a lot of influence at that point and made a bunch of demands to have Picard be more action-oriented.
Anyway. Basic point is that Star Trek has had an un-smart period, but once upon a time it was smart. And perhaps it’s starting to get smart again, Strange New Worlds and Lower Decks have been quite promising in that regard IMO.
I was having a great time with Abrams’ Star Trek up until Spok’s mom dies and Vulcan was destroyed. :(