• saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    IDK is it really, to me pegging the value to some arbitrary piece of metal seems weirder. If we actually traded real gold and the government decided “hey no, that doesn’t count” you’d be forced to give it back anyway, and they could also force you to do it for no gold. Monetary value only ever had one real source and that’s the person with sufficient force to enforce the trade, which in any stable country is the government.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Funnily enough about that “forced to give back real gold used for trade”, the US kinda did that at one point, making it for a time illegal to possess more than a certain amount of gold and requiring people give anything over that amount to the government for a set price.