Look at all those healthcare companies. Fifty years ago, such a list might have a Big Pharma company, but no patient care portals at all (hospitals, pharmacies, etc). Now they dominate the whole list.
And it’s also worth noting that several of these are also huge players in the opioid crisis, including the four who settled to avoid state lawsuits that would have gutted them (looking at you Cencora, McKesson, Johnson&Johnson, and Cardinal Health).
Hey, maybe you would know… why are pharmacies/pharmacists being sued for the opioid crisis? I could understand suing pharmacies back in the day when pharmacists were able to dispense meds without a Dr’s Rx, but when Congress stripped pharmacists of basically all power except strictly following a written script in the early 80s as part of the war on drugs, it seems like modern pharmacies have two options with an opioid Rx. Do their jobs and fill it, or do their jobs and don’t fill it. And the filling it job seems like the more responsible choice. I am a lawyer and I really don’t understand the theory of recovery and I enjoy talking about it more than reading up on it. Is it just that the pharmacies have deep pockets?
The average pharmacy is not in any danger here at all, and unless a specific pharmacist is personally involved in illegal dispensing, they’re not in any danger here either, as far as I know. So if you know of specific pharmacists or non-franchise pharmacies caught up in this, you would have to look at the specifics of their individual infractions, or what the feds claim there is.
The problem is the huge chains, and to a much smaller extent their pharmacists. What the various DEA investigations found out is that in the states where the opioid crisis was/is the worst, the corruption went all the way up the supply chain. The actual prescription is just the first stop, but after that you have chains like CVS that were receiving literally truckloads of nothing but opioids at their regional supply houses, fully aware of their part in the whole thing but they were making MASSIVE coin, so why stop the gravy train?
You’re right, individual pharmacists have to fill a script they are given unless they have cause to believe it’s fraudulent in some way, but again, the problem wasn’t truly at the pharmacist level, it was from the top down. So any pharmacist who recognized that 20 scripts a day (or whatever number) from the same pain doc, day after day, was out of the norm and reported it to management was simply told to keep filling it regardless. And this went on regardless of how extreme the problem became, to the point that some individual pharmacies were distributing almost no prescriptions other than opioids.
Incidentally, this is how McKesson (a drug maker) ended up afoul of the feds: they knew exactly how much oxy and hydro they were shipping, to whom, and were all too well aware that the majority of that had to be to fill scripts that were less than legitimately gotten. By the time it got to state lawsuits the states had everything they needed to prove that it had been going on for years with McKesson’s full knowledge and blessing. Same for the other defendants who settled: they would have been gutted, and the proof by that point was legally indefensible.
WaPo did a huge series on this whole thing two or three years ago that is well worth the read, if you’re interested. Let me know and I’ll dig up the links (I have spare gift links, don’t worry about the paywall). This is the gift link to the main article about all the pieces they investigated: https://wapo.st/3MLJG43
Look at all those healthcare companies. Fifty years ago, such a list might have a Big Pharma company, but no patient care portals at all (hospitals, pharmacies, etc). Now they dominate the whole list.
And it’s also worth noting that several of these are also huge players in the opioid crisis, including the four who settled to avoid state lawsuits that would have gutted them (looking at you Cencora, McKesson, Johnson&Johnson, and Cardinal Health).
Hey, maybe you would know… why are pharmacies/pharmacists being sued for the opioid crisis? I could understand suing pharmacies back in the day when pharmacists were able to dispense meds without a Dr’s Rx, but when Congress stripped pharmacists of basically all power except strictly following a written script in the early 80s as part of the war on drugs, it seems like modern pharmacies have two options with an opioid Rx. Do their jobs and fill it, or do their jobs and don’t fill it. And the filling it job seems like the more responsible choice. I am a lawyer and I really don’t understand the theory of recovery and I enjoy talking about it more than reading up on it. Is it just that the pharmacies have deep pockets?
The average pharmacy is not in any danger here at all, and unless a specific pharmacist is personally involved in illegal dispensing, they’re not in any danger here either, as far as I know. So if you know of specific pharmacists or non-franchise pharmacies caught up in this, you would have to look at the specifics of their individual infractions, or what the feds claim there is.
The problem is the huge chains, and to a much smaller extent their pharmacists. What the various DEA investigations found out is that in the states where the opioid crisis was/is the worst, the corruption went all the way up the supply chain. The actual prescription is just the first stop, but after that you have chains like CVS that were receiving literally truckloads of nothing but opioids at their regional supply houses, fully aware of their part in the whole thing but they were making MASSIVE coin, so why stop the gravy train?
You’re right, individual pharmacists have to fill a script they are given unless they have cause to believe it’s fraudulent in some way, but again, the problem wasn’t truly at the pharmacist level, it was from the top down. So any pharmacist who recognized that 20 scripts a day (or whatever number) from the same pain doc, day after day, was out of the norm and reported it to management was simply told to keep filling it regardless. And this went on regardless of how extreme the problem became, to the point that some individual pharmacies were distributing almost no prescriptions other than opioids.
Incidentally, this is how McKesson (a drug maker) ended up afoul of the feds: they knew exactly how much oxy and hydro they were shipping, to whom, and were all too well aware that the majority of that had to be to fill scripts that were less than legitimately gotten. By the time it got to state lawsuits the states had everything they needed to prove that it had been going on for years with McKesson’s full knowledge and blessing. Same for the other defendants who settled: they would have been gutted, and the proof by that point was legally indefensible.
WaPo did a huge series on this whole thing two or three years ago that is well worth the read, if you’re interested. Let me know and I’ll dig up the links (I have spare gift links, don’t worry about the paywall). This is the gift link to the main article about all the pieces they investigated: https://wapo.st/3MLJG43