• Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, we cannot be the solution. Individual consumer behavior cannot change systemic issues. The only viable solution to Climate Change is at the ballot box. Out of control billionaires and vested fossil fuel interests cannot be swayed by asking people to pretty please go into massive debt to buy a Tesla instead of a sub 10k beater they can afford.

    Nothing of what you’re suggesting is sufficient or even realistic for most people. You want someone earning 30k a year to buy solar panels!? Are you mad?

    We don’t need a handful of people doing zero waste perfectly, we need millions to EAT THE RICH.

    • unix84@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those people earning 30k a year still buy gas guzzlers and vote for the billionaires to stay in charge while getting their information from other billionaires.

      They need a mindset change. That happens at the local level, through word of mouth and seeing their peers making lifestyle change.

      • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I’m familiar with the demographic, I just don’t see them changing because their “weirdo libtard” neighbor bought a used Prius or something. At this point I feel like you’re either onboard with the whole “climate change is real and bad and something should be done” agenda or else living in clown world mainlining alternative “facts.” And how do you even discuss these issues with someone who disputes the nature of reality itself? If you’ve got that one figured out please share because it’ll be useful in talking to my parents.

        • unix84@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You have to make it beneficial to them. “Yeah this thing is a lot cheaper and more reliable than my old car and I hate having to go to gas stations with all those shady people” goes a lot further than, “We need to adjust our habits to curb a runaway greenhouse effect and the best we can hope for is only 2.5C warming by 2100.” One makes them consider electric; the other makes them avoid (and hate) you.

          Either that, or just convince them not to vote. “Yeah the election was rigged, not even worth it to go vote anymore.”

    • ebikefolder@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I earn less than 30K, and spent a few hundred here, a few hundred there, over the years, in renewable energy co-ops in my region. In total, my share of those installations now produces more than I consume. Our next project: charging stations for EVs, although I don’t even have a car.

      I don’t have to have my own panels or windmills or chargers.

      Yes, ballot box. Of course ballot box! And at least new combustion engine cars, for example, will be a thing of the past in a few years, here in Europe, thanks to ballot box. But I don’t want people to buy a Tesla. I want people to buy no car at all. And I want countries to tax the crap out of fuel for both surface and air transport. But how realistic is this ballot box solution?

      We need both. Individual behaviour and ballot box.

    • fishtacos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You noted that the ballot box is the best way to do this, but that we also have to eat the rich. The big problem is that the ballot box is controlled by the rich. Both sides of the I’ll are paid off by corporate interests… And they don’t care about climate change…

      The ONLY solution is to EAT THE RICH… The ballot box will actually be taken care of when corporations can’t pay off politicians anymore.