I’ve always had a stupid pipe dream of building an “analog” car if you will, where there are absolutely zero electronics in the car and it’s just pure road feel. Sounds really stupid and impractical in a modern context but was wondering when was the last time we had truly mechanical cars before electronic assistance became the norm?

  • nguyenm@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just rent a 1970s Cessna 152s or 172s and do a few laps in the traffic pattern with it. All analogue guages, carbureted engine with direct throttle and direct mixture control.

    Even starting the damn thing requires manual priming with fuel. It’s doubly fun if you happen to flood it with too much fuel and having to do a flooded engine start.

    Realistic answer would be a Go-Kart built with 2-stroke engines. Your butt is the suspension so you’d feel the road alright.

    • HymenopusCoronatuSFF@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, flying GA really makes you appreciate the technology in car engines.

      Could even go further with a 1930s/40s J3 with no electrical system at all haha

  • supern8ural@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s go the whole way with this and not have power steering or power brakes either. Lotus Seven anyone? Yes please!

    Edit: now that I think about it, my old Porsche 914 would also qualify, although it had a rudimentary form of fuel injection.

  • Slideways@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are trying so hard to be pedantic without actually reading the question.

    An electronic ignition is not “electronic assistance”.

    An electronic fuel injector is not “electronic assistance”.

  • MercuryMorrison1971@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I miss cabled throttles, they were so much more responsive. These days you have to spend a grand on a custom dyno tune just program out the throttle lag from fly by wire throttles.

  • Dirtyace@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jeep 4.0 had it through 2006.

    Ford lightnings and cobras through 2004.

    Vipers had it through 06 at least maybe later.

    I think LS motors as well.

  • ausnee@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You should probably drive an analog car before you start obsessing over building one.

  • Pixelplanet5@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    yea this is very stupid and impractical because you are 100% not realizing what it means to have a car with zero electronics.

    you would basically have to go back to the very first cars ever made where you started the engine with a hand crank and your head lights were candles in a glass housing.

  • 45acp_LS1_Cessna@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    what are you talking about…like 100% no electronics or majority of the car close to such? a 2002 camaro had a cable throttle body…1960’s sports cars had a ton of mechanical aspects minus ignition systems.

    Generally…1960’s-1970’s

  • lawtechie@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pure analog or very direct feel? Carbs (even CV Hitachi, SU or Stombergs) don’t feel as instant as the EFI in 90’s sports cars.

  • KinkyMasta@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Lotus Elise S1 is the newest production car I can think that has:

    • Mechanical Throttle
    • No Brake Servo
    • No Power steering

    Obviously more focused track cars like Caterhams and Radicals maybe had them for longer.