Roman Abramovich is accused of paying people under the table. Man City have 115 charges.

Under Abramovich Chelsea have won - 5 League titles, 2 UCLs, 2 Europa Leagues, 5 FA Cups, 3 energy drink Cups, 2 supercups,

Under Sheikh Mansour Man City have won - 7 league titles, 1 UCL, 3 FA Cups 6 energy drink cups, 1 super cup.

Lets say hypothetically the EPL manage to prove it happened. And the points deduction is something that even Man City cannot recover from Eg. 90+ points deducted.

Would you be willing to accept a relegation to the championship for the above memories?

Eg. you saw your club win those things and have the memories of watching it?

  • Apprehensive_Bill339@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Accept relagation for the kind of success you mentioned??

    1,000,000%

    If we’re presuming all accusations are true, take city for example, without breaking the rules there accused of breaking, couldn’t of had the all the top players they’ve had over the years rising to the top.

    If they get relegated would they suddenly not become arguably the best team in the world? I don’t even think they’d loose any players lol an then they’d also get a bite at the 100mil you get for promotion to prem the following year.

    For me if these accusations are true, then the horse has already bolted, you can’t undo the gains gotten by breaking the rules, it’s just the normal ethos of FFP

    The richest clubs breaking financial rules? Let’s fine them, yeh they’ll definitely feel that

    The best club on the pitch that consistently gets most points and easy wins? Take some points of them, yeh they’ll deffo feel that…

    If it was up to me the punishment should follow whatever rules you broke, if you inflated your sponsorships so the club can spend more money and you did it across a 6 year period, then I’d follow the detail and slap it back at them, ok next 6 years you have a spending cap, can’t spend more than 50mil in a window or something like that.

    Fact remains if city get found guilty and docked points or relegated, they’d take there punishment and be back an then all that’s left is banter really.

  • Hambatz@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rangers fan here definitely it did help that all the success happened when I was about 8-18

    And the bad bit was much later in life when I had bigger priorities

  • lardoni@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely not. If my club did this I would feel sick and I am pretty sure I would stop supporting them. Fans who defend City and Chelsea are just glory hunters with no morals.

  • gaybraham-lincoln@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am assuming if they are willing to relegate them they will strip them of titles as well

    not that anything is going to happen, the FA have no spine and City are their darlings

    • Cowboy_on_fire@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact that anyone thinks the FA like City is a mystery to me. Both UEFA and the FA hate city and that’s why we boy anthems and turn our backs.

    • johnnym1965@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe Liverpool should have been penalised harder for espionage.

      No, that’s completely different!

    • Provider0fMyCheddar@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They can’t strip titles, I believe it’s not a penalty they can deal. Which makes it all the more galling that these things drag on 14 years.

      Even if relegated you could argue it’s the price of doing business and well worth the cost. A team like City couldn’t have become what it is by following rules designed to stifle competition and let the same group of preferred teams win the league.

      • Retinion@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They can’t strip titles, I believe it’s not a penalty they can deal.

        Yes they can.

  • Similar_thought123@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    lol. Chelsea and City are the two Clubs that won the most trophies in the last 20 years of english football. While they are writing history all the other clubs try to grasp on the memories of the old, forgotten glory days where they once won a trophy or two. Like 40 years ago or some bullshit like this. And they are proud of it that their last trophy was this long ago. They call it history. Yeah, im sure all your grandpas had an amazing time.

    Chelsea made the premier league lively again. Man united and arsenal would have won every damn year. Lets be honest, united alot more than arsenal. Chelsea made it interesting again. Suddenly there was new competition. What actually was also better for the smaller teams at the end of the day but you aint ready for this topic. They rescued the premier league you should all fall on your knees and kiss their boots for that or you would have bayern 2.0 with united and 11 wins in a row. After what Chelsea did foreign billionairs looked at it and saw it was possible and thats how City came along. They added another name to the mix. Cry all you want. You small clubs wish you would have someone stucking some money down your clubs ass. [Insert any of those petty other 14 clubs name] fans wish they had an owner who invest like city. Now all the fragile little peoples want to dismiss all those accomplishments as if Chelsea didnt ended Arsenal and City didnt ended United ON THE PITCH and started a new era of football. They obliterated you and instead of welcoming new competition you cry cheats and god knows what. As if the other clubs didnt do the same shit. Yeah sure, United never paid some extra cash. Sure, Juve didnt do that. Barca is a holy lamb they would never do that. Ahm… anybody remember Blackburn Rovers? Lmao. All you guys are petty as fuck. You would take those accomplishments in a heart beat. The smaller clubs never saw european play for decades and even the best of the small clubs, Spurs, didnt win shit for 30 years.

    But sure, lie to yourself and all the others lmfao

  • daddyderose@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a man city fan I’d take it. The “cheating” in question is financial doping. Which is literally just a small club, levelling the playing field with the big clubs. So if we get relegated so be it. I have those memories and no one can take it from me, we were relegated once, we can come back up.

  • ScootPootin@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah. It’s fun to overperform as underdogs. Non-elite team fans would’ve just picked a bandwagon team to start with if they felt this way.

  • ThisReditter@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sooo you are asking if they want a perceived happy childhood and find out it’s all a lie in their 20s and might not recover from that trauma for decades?

    • rockforahead@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve really enjoyed these years as a City fan and would follow us down the divisions if we get hit with a penalty. The alleged “cheating” is offering higher wages to players as the Chelsea fan said. It’s not match fixing or anything dirty. Also just seeing the football we played and the team spirit we have going is something I’ll never forget.

  • CarneyVore14@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not just defending my team, but is it right to punish the current players and owners for the previous owners illegal moves? Definitely shouldn’t just let them off the hook and sure remove some of the trophies from that era. For Chelsea they already forced the owner to rush a sell (justifiably).

  • tiford88@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Relegation to the championship would be near-meaningless. They’d be back the next season

    • ALA02@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They need the Rangers treatment. I reckon Chelsea would slowly come back, Man City I’m not so sure. Small club with a decade of bought success, at least Chelsea had some history before the Russian money came in. Repossess the stadium and make City an example of what happens to cheaters in football. Punish Chelsea harshly as well.

      • pro_crasSn8r@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Small club with a decade of bought success, at least Chelsea had some history before the Russian money came in

        Before the Abramovich takeover, Chelsea had 1 top flight title, 2 second division titles, 3 FA cups, 2 League Cups, and 2 UEFA Cup Winners Cup.

        Before ADUG takeover, City had 2 top flight titles, 7 second division titles, 4 FA cups, 2 League Cups, and 1 Cup Winners Cup.

      • rockforahead@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is so lame. City existed before your club and has tonnes of history. Also has a fan base who famously followed their team to the lower divisions in their thousands each week. You don’t know what you’re talking about obviously.

        • MarcelloduBois93@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As a United fan, I agree City had success and a decent fan base long before the takeover.

          I’ll always have a soft spot for City for sharing their ground with United during the war and for their respect when Munich happened - unlike other teams, like Leeds, who were awful.

          • rockforahead@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks for the kind words. I shouldn’t say it but I have a small soft spot for United fans sometimes too. It’s better when we have a good rivalry between the two Manchester clubs. Although I don’t forgive you for the 34 years banner, you lot are usually pretty resonable.

      • Thatisabatonpenis@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Small club with a decade of bought success, at least Chelsea had some history before the Russian money came in.

        r/confidentlyincorrect gold!

      • slimboyslim9@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are sustainability rules, you can only spend a set amount more than you bring in. With PL revenue gone, City/Chelsea would need to sustain their sponsorship and ticket revenue in order to afford their wages etc. It’s done on a three year rolling calculation so they’d be ok if they came right back up but if somehow they shat the bed and didn’t, it could get interesting for them. Although if they didn’t come straight back up they’d then qualify for parachute payments, ridiculously enough.

      • jod1991@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are FFP rules. Similar but lower amounts than the prem.

        Without TV and European money city would have to sell near every player to not breach it.