People think that scrapping FFP will help the league. But in reality, it will make clubs spend beyond their spending and incur more debts.

This will be a bad thing for smaller clubs, who are trying to compete with big clubs.

The top 6 have rich owners, while clubs like city and New Castle united have states backing them up. They can spend as much as they want. Meanwhile, smaller clubs will not have the means to compete with them.

FFP is there to level up the ground and make sure lower clubs don’t bankrupt themselves. You can hate it as much as you want to, but without it alot of clubs will go bankrupt and even go in to administration.

  • Underdog187@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Exactly. If you can only afford average players then average players is all you’re going to get. How is a smaller team supposed to grow and compete if it’s only allowed to spend a fraction of a sky 6 club.

    • Hungry_Bodybuilder57@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same way it happens in any other industry. When did United, Liverpool or Arsenal need to receive a giant cash injection from an oil state to get to the top?

      • Podberezkin09@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Lol they weren’t from oil states but all of those clubs became successful by investing money into the club and outspending everyone else.