• zombuey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The scariest thing I hear time and time again from Christians is the following.

    “I don’t trust people who don’t believe in god because they have no moral compass.”

    They say this in such a matter of fact way. Most people have a good understanding of right and wrong without a rule book. For many that “moral compass” is intrinsic, even instinctual. It is an evolved part of humanity that helps us operate within a society. The Christian’s are saying it is a core piece of humanity that they lack and since they model their perception of others after themselves they cannot fathom that concept. They are broken humans who without a ruler/leader would be dangerously unpredictable and violent as they have no system to make good choices. This is why those same people prefer a king.

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They say all that while being shitty entitled people though. And they justify it by thinking they’re better than everyone else because they’re “godly”

      • zombuey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The worst atrocities in history have been conducted by those who were convinced it was for a righteous cause. The quote goes

        “With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil - that takes religion.”

        ― Steven Weinberg

    • Chailles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also kinda shows they don’t really know nor care what a moral compass even is. It isn’t a magical thing that lets a person know right from wrong, it’s just a set of beliefs to dictate what that person believes is right and wrong. I know what principles guide me and it doesn’t matter whether other people think it’s flawed or inconsiderate, it is exactly what it is, a guide, a compass.

      Everyone has one, it just doesn’t necessarily fit within their standards.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think that most Christians don’t feel that they personally need the leash, but are so pessimistic about society that they think everybody else needs the leash.

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not an unfair assumption though. I’m atheist and I agree that without laws and regulations people would tear each other apart over dumb shit

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is fine because we have laws and whatnot. It really isn’t even an opinion thing. The vast majority of human history we did not have anything even resembling a government and the data from dug up humans is clear. We are murder machines. No mammal kills members of its own species as much as humans do. Even in modern times the experiment has been run when places lost their police forces.

  • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just maybe the main issue is kind of the fact that nobody on either part of the discussion can properly read a fucking book.

    Might be just my imagination playing with me, but most fucking people in the Bible were committing atrocities even despite being the main protagonists. And the ones that did not, were fucking murdered left and right.

    • islandofcaucasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is exactly what atheists have been saying the whole time, so I’m not sure what you mean when you say that nobody on either part can properly read a book.

    • KRAW@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Anyone in the Bible who isn’t Jesus isn’t meant to be a role model. The Bible is in fact very clear about that.

        • KRAW@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The entire (well most) Old Testament is the Jews constantly screwing up and doing terrible things while God continually face palms and fixes their mess. The whole reason Jesus is even on Earth is because there wasn’t a single soul who could’ve been a model human being otherwise.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That seems derived and also ignores the Patriarchs and Matriarchs of the first five books. Also the whole thing about Jesus living a perfect life is only found in one part of John right?

            • KRAW@linux.community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Not really. All of them are portrayed as doing things that Jewish culture would view unfavorably or immoral. God isn’t exactly giving a stamp of approval to each action of these figures. Pretty much any time they do anything good it is because God enabled them to do it either through miraculous acts or by instructing them.

              Also Jesus is considered the son of God throughout the entire New Testament. Maybe the word “perfect” isn’t used, but he is portrayed as a model human being throughout. Otherwise his sacrifice wouldn’t be able to serve it’s purpose.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                All of them are portrayed as doing things that Jewish culture would view unfavorably or immoral. God isn’t exactly giving a stamp of approval to each action of these figures. Pretty much any time they do anything good it is because God enabled them to do it either through miraculous acts or by instructing them.

                Examples?

                Also Jesus is considered the son of God throughout the entire New Testament.

                Except in Mark and the Q source.

                • KRAW@linux.community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Examples?

                  Abraham, the OG benificiary of the covenant with God, lies about his wife twice. Moses kills an Egyptian. These are all things that the Commandments explicitly mark as immoral behaviors. Obviously the success the figures experienced also had nothing to do with their own ability, e.g. Moses did not part the Red Seas by himself.

                  Except in Mark and the Q source.

                  The first verse of Mark calls him the Son of God. The Q source is also a purely hypothetical book, so while it technically doesn’t say Jesus is the Son of God, it also doesn’t say anything at all until it is actually found.

        • KRAW@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, I don’t have the perspective to speak on how a Jew might view major figures in the Old Testament. I would guess they would still view them as imperfect people as even major figures like David are portrayed as doing immoral things.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My bro Elijah was an absolute beast against the prophets of Baal bro teared a new one on them haha

        Jael was fucking brutal dealing that fatality

        And jehud was the least based Male at his time

  • ThePac@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean… That’s the whole point of Christianity, right? It’s not exactly refuting their beliefs.

    • OwenEverbinde@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a good point. They think all people are bad people on leashes.

      Though, while it may not refute their beliefs, it certainly makes an argument in favor of not allowing them to enact legislation.

    • Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right. Basically, Christians would totally kill you if they didn’t think God would punish them

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A while back I got to see a Buddhist Hell Garden. I remember wondering what freaken sociopath was given access to the resources to build this and why. If you haven’t seen one just imagine some horrible middle ages painting that the Catholics are ashamed of made with 3D and you can walk around looking at statues getting things crammed into their ass or in a boiling pot.

    This is real religion. This isn’t the Disneyfied cleaned up Jesus loves the little children of the developed world.

  • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean that’s just one way to interpret it. Another way is that these myths are just stories of the human experience.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People take them seriously though, and often try to write laws based on their religion. They’re not simply myths, they are more dangerous than that.

      • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point I’m trying to make is that these things are open to interpretations. There are religious people who take them literally and other religious people who don’t.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you mean that they have training from childhood, society, the people around them, and their own instincts then yes.

      In the very loose sense of the word. Guess you could also say every single ocean is just water with gravity acting on it.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If everyone just did what they wanted randomly, we’d have died out long ago, but hey, we’d be free!

      • OwenEverbinde@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. Every ocean is just a cloud being held down by gravity.

        In these metaphors though, gravity (or the leash Kanda mentioned) would need to be: philosophy, trial and error, oxytocin, endorphins, historical knowledge, the ability to accrue knowledge in the first place, empathy, self interest, reproductive drive, natural selection, and more.

        Remove all of the forces that make humans kind to each other… and you wouldn’t have humans anymore. Just like removing gravity would eliminate both oceans AND clouds.

  • Pleaseletmeinalready@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hot take, this is correct. When someone cuts me off in traffic and I want to murder them religion is all “hey don’t do that, it’s bad”. When I see pretty women my body and mind tells me I should try to have sex with all of them and religion is all “don’t listen to all of your urges, maybe your desires shouldn’t control you” When I see rich people with rich people things and my instinct is to steal all of their belongings and religion steps in and says “this is objectively wrong”

    • n3m37h@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hot take, this is correct. When someone cuts me off in traffic and I want to murder them religion is all “hey don’t do that, it’s bad”. When I see pretty women my body and mind tells me I should try to have sex with all of them and religion is all “don’t listen to all of your urges, maybe your desires shouldn’t control you” When I see rich people with rich people things and my instinct is to steal all of their belongings and religion steps in and says “this is objectively wrong”

      Hahahahaha, pure gold right there

      • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Didnt you know there was no such thing as morals before religion? I thought it was common knowledge. Nevermind those religions that sacrificed humans and animals to gods or had child sex slaves because when I say religion, I mean Christianity. And everyone knows that Christians are the most moral people there are!

    • Pleaseletmeinalready@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fuck I realized what this community was named after I posted and realized this was not the place for my hot take. Sorry guys! Carry on, totally respect/support you