I was looking through lap times of different production cars, and there are some wildly out of place cars doing ring laptimes, some cars are faster than they seem they should be, while others are slower than they should be. Which got me thinking how some cars truly get tested in showroom condition, and others get the “marketing” treatment to produce a laptime a showroom car would never touch, solely to sell more cars. Then I found this article that talks exactly about just that.

https://www.thedrive.com/porsche/11012/nurburgring-times-dont-matter

    • lee1026@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      NJ and its ultra short freeway merges say that 0-60 is the all important number, at least for those of us living somewhere with bad highway designs.

      • Crayondetailnstuff@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        😂 merging onto 295 was always a good time in my lighting on 315 radials, except the one time there was snow on the ground… that was sketchy.

      • These-Guard-7297@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nope. It’s still 5 to 60 that’s more relevant unless you’re doing a 5k clutch dump with flat shifting or using launch mode.

      • Nidos@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Merging onto 1&9 off of 35 in Woodbridge and having to immediately cut across 2 lanes to make it to route 9 taught me how important that 0-60 really is

      • Ghost17088@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        0-30 and close to weight capacity. I bought my Rav4 as a work vehicle, and you would be amazed at how much difference not having 400-500 lbs of tools/parts in the back makes.

    • I_do_ok_things@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You don’t want to start at a moving speed as it creates other variables to take into consideration that will affect the time. Starting at 0 will give the most consistent start each time and give replicable results for others.

      • These-Guard-7297@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nope. You can get consistent times from 5 mph starts. Of course it creates other variables, but it’s more representative of daily driving since a lot of people will regularly floor their car.

        But they’re not using launch mode or dumping the clutch from 5k rpm which is what you get when you do 0 to 60 times.

    • DdCno1@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      None of these times are relevant for real world driving. My car needs 17 seconds from 0 to 60 (more in the eco mode I’m always using) and it’s always fast enough to keep up with traffic.