E.g. abortion rights, anti-LGBTQ, contempt for atheism, Christian nationalism, etc.

  • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    You said this:

    Perhaps, but it will likely at least severely reduce it.

    I rejected that. I didn’t say “there would be the same amount of abortions no matter the law” or anything like you seem to think. I don’t think it would be “severely” reduced, and the negatives are extreme to the point of being unacceptable.

    As for the data you want me to provide, I refer to the other things said. Unless you agree to also put in the effort to provide data to support your argument, I’m not going to put in all that effort for a random internet convo. Since you made the first claim (at least that I interacted with) (“Perhaps, but it will likely at least severely reduce it”), you can go first.

    To be blunt I find the behaviour of demanding rigorous sources and academic honesty in internet arguments obnoxious and hypocritical. Very few people read them, they just want them as stamps of approval. And most conversations I see where someone is demanding sources, they are who should be logically providing sources to the conversation. It is just a silly part of internet culture dancing around pretending to be intellectualism. On a personal level I do love sources though, when they get posted. Not just for accuracy, I find them fun to read.

    • FrenLivesMatter@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Okay, well I don’t care enough about winning arguments on the Internet in order to write a whole research paper right now, so I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree and call it a draw.

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That is exactly my point. Glad you could see it my way.

        Except for the draw part. This wasn’t a competition, and in the nicest way possible, I’ll just walk away from this thinking you are fully incorrect, and I assume you will do the same about me. “Agree to disagree” is more for people who actually know each other. Bye stranger!

        • FrenLivesMatter@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well, a draw means that neither of us is more correct than the other, at least that’s what I’ll take away from this.

        • FrenLivesMatter@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not as ridiculous as you, who, having made no arguments whatsoever, just comes barging in two days later just to give their opinion on the matter.

          • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You sound like a petulant child out of their depth. An intelligent person would have a fairly easy time figuring out where I stand on the topic based on my response.

            Forgive me for not being terminally online and Lemmy showing me older posts.

            • FrenLivesMatter@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah, I’m afraid that’s just an ad hominem, not an argument.

              And no, I don’t have a problem figuring out where you stand on the issue, but since you apparently can’t even defend your position without resorting to insults, this seems to be a clear case of “you can’t reason anyone out of an opinion which by reason they never acquired”.

              • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                If you think you have the right to tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body then I don’t give a flying fuck about anything you have to say, regardless of how you dress it up.

                Don’t bother responding.

                • FrenLivesMatter@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Of course I have a right to tell her that, whether or not she actually does it, or whether I have the right to violently enforce my opinion on her is an entirely different matter. But we were just arguing hypotheticals in this thread anyways.

                  FWIW I’m not convinced that banning abortion is the solution, but neither that making it easier and safer to access solves any problems, because neither do anything to address the root cause of why women feel like they need to have any abortions at all (excluding those necessary for medical reasons of course).

                  But sure, I’m clearly the petulant child here that’s out of my depth, because an intelligent person would have no problem seeing such nuances instead of resorting to politically popular catch phrases.

                  And it’s funny, isn’t it, because women tell men all the time what they ought to do with their bodies (go to work, make money, provide for the family, share the housework, don’t drink, don’t do drugs, the list goes on), yet as a man, I’m supposedly not allowed to even have an opinion what what a woman should do with hers? I’m sorry, that just sounds like blatant sexism, but I’m sure that as long as it’s in favor of women, you’re perfectly happy accepting that.