It is a fantastic vehicle with good range, decent charging, impeccable safety, built-in Android interface and Google Maps, and older models sell for similar prices to the Ioniq 5 / ID4 etc. I test drove it and it is luxuirous, comfy, and just a great and beautiful car. I don’t even see it mentioned almost ever.

I’m guessing perhaps the range, but the 2024 RWD model has around 300mi and AWD 256mi of range. Older ones around 220mi. I’m considering it above all others I’ve driven because it has better ride height and viewing angles for me as I’m tall with a very long torso.

  • JackfruitCrazy51@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I assume because people compare it to something like a model Y, which costs less and most would consider a better vehicle overall?

  • dima1109@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    people on here think a car that gets less than 300 miles, charges at less than 200kw, and isn’t built on a dEdiCaTeD eV pLaTfOrM is pointless

    • raculot@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It charges at 200KW on a DCFC, and has nearly 300 miles of range (293 miles on the RWD version). It’s pretty close to the exact specs you’re mentioning.

      • dima1109@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        these are relatively recent improvements, and all model years before this one have been dogged

  • DuncanIdaho88@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    A Volvo XC40 is fairly expensive. It’s a premium car and you get what you pay for, but people would rather buy a cheap car now and deal with expensive repairs later.

    • Teutonic-Tonic@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes we are in a strange time with EV’s where limited option means that someone will commonly cross shop a Kia, Chevy, Audi and VW which doesn’t often happen with ICE cars. The advantages that luxury makes have don’t stand out as much as everyone looks at range / charging network as holding more importance than build quality, features and dealership experience. My wife wanted a Lexus EV simply because she loved the Lexus dealership/service experience with her old hybrid…. But once she realized it didn’t matter since an EV barely goes back for service we settled on a lightly used Volvo.

      • Varjohaltia@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not only that, but I cross shopped BMW, Mercedes, Polestar and Kia and Kia lost on price :o

      • DuncanIdaho88@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not really. A Volvo is cheaper to maintain than a Tesla. Hyundai and Kia too. Buy cheap, buy twice.

        Tesla is filling the battery packs with foam to make then unrepairable.

  • AintLongButItsSkinny@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    For $55,000? You can get a long range Model Y for less with better range and charging, even better safety, better driver assistance, better sound system, better screen & navigation

    A coworker was renting the XC40 and didn’t like it. I didn’t drive it but it seemed poorly engineered.

    • Frunk is tiny
    • Really bad backup camera on a small screen
    • Not nearly as spacious as a Model Y
    • Transmission hump in the back row

    About average for a car company’s first EV built on an ICE platform. I do like the exterior look and overall dimensions.

    • Runaway_5@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      better range and charging, even better safety, better driver assistance, better sound system, better screen & navigation

      You aint wrong on some but the Volvo has google maps built in AND a heads up display AND a center display all with maps. Can’t beat that. Tesla is safe but Volvo is the best at safety. Many gripe about phantom braking and Tesla not having 360 cameras etc, and the Volvo beats it there.

      You’re right on space, but for my needs (any many others) definitely don’t need that much space. To each their own.

      I also would NEVER get a car with a full glass roof here in the mountains. The sun is 4x stronger here than CA and hail is very common here and a huge risk.

      • AintLongButItsSkinny@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Agree on most points.

        Navigation is subjective but I absolutely prefer Tesla’s to Google’s or Apple’s, mostly because the screen is so large, I have access to music while I navigate. Charging integration into navigation can’t be beat either.

        Having lived without a heads up display I can say I don’t miss it at all.

        Lack of USS is a very valid gripe for the Tesla. So stupid for them to remove those.

        I have a bald head and have lived with the Model 3 in Arizona. No issues with the glass roof.

        Tesla has better safety than Volvo contrary to very popular belief. All of Tesla’s models have better crash ratings that Volvo’s safest car ever. That’s just a fact, Jack.

  • SmakeTalk@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I considered it a lot myself last year, and earlier this year, but I was more interested in the C40 (more for style, I didn’t mind the loss in space). I ultimately chose something else because the range wasn’t remotely best-in-class and I wasn’t comfortable with what could end up being a very expensive car (service-wide) in 5 years, and I felt like it would just feel outdated over a long period of time (especially since Volvo has more EV’s coming that feel more fresh and compelling).

    They are fantastic vehicles, but to me they just aren’t the best option in their category or price range.

  • twtxrx@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    We have a 2021 XC40 Recharge and love it. It’s a great car. The main drawback as you’ve noted is range and by 2024 standards slower charging. The 2024 models with the 82kWh batteries and new motor configs will largely solve those issues.

  • Wazzzup3232@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Bad ADAS is a reason I would have a hard time considering one.

    Unless you get an EX-30 the ADAS system bounces you all over the road from everything I’ve seen AND you generally have to pay more to get it in the first place

      • a_brain@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve tried it a couple times. It’s bad. The biggest issue is no capacitive steering wheel which makes it really annoying to use on long, straight roads because you need to jiggle the wheel every 10 seconds to let it know you’re there even if you’re holding the wheel. It ping-ponged between the lanes, didn’t take curves very well, and didn’t give a lot of feedback other than a couple very small icons on the driver’s display about what it was doing.

        Compared to travel assist on my ID4 or super cruise on my wife’s Bolt, it’s night and day.

      • Intrepid-Working-731@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        In terms of the semi-autonomous highway driving system, Pilot Assist, I haven’t heard the best things about it, at least in the current Volvo models. Ping-pong-y driving, doesn’t handle curves great and deactivates without warning often. Tesla Autopilot, VW Travel Assist, GM SuperCruise and Ford BlueCruise all seem to be superior.

        In terms of the other driver assist systems (auto brake, lane keep, etc.) Volvo seems to be just as good as the rest.

  • BlazinAzn38@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    For me the value wasn’t there when we were shopping. When we were looking on 2021/2022 it was like $62K delivered for 220 miles of range. I know range isn’t the only thing that matters but that to me felt really bad

    • slbnoob@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also you had to add on the adaptive cruise control package which just comes standard on other competing cars.

  • roastbits@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I bought one recently and it’s been great so far. It looks good, it’s fast, comfortable, and has good features. Traded in a newer ICE car and also got a 7000 discount so the price was great.

  • Mysterious_Mouse_388@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    what else have you considered? what makes it better than an Ioniq 5 or a Model Y? You’d really buy it because its beautiful? haha, thats so silly… thats not the #1 reason I got an ioniq 5…

  • phillyfandc@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Too pricey for what it is. I ordered one but 61k was too much. Also the different trim levels pissed me off. That being said, I am considering a used one.