• rm2601@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That I humbly disagree with. The W211 (2003-2009) was when QC started to pick back up, and the W212 (2010-2015.5) was as good as the W211 and only built up on the 211’s excellence. The W212 was and still is as solid and stout of a luxury mid-sized saloon as they came. The W213 isn’t bad, as it was still decent, but the W212 was the cream of the crop for modern E classes. There was a moment when MB started emphasizing quality again (the period being 2010-2019~ish), though they have gone back to cost-cutting and overcomplicating for the sake of modernizing.

    • Oh_G_Steve@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t sleep on the 2009-2015 era cars. the 6 Cyls on the W212 are pretty bullet proof.

        • zeroonetw@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I had the turbo 4 version of the W204 ‘12 MY. It was not a tank and developed engine porosity at 100k miles. I guess the 6 cylinders were better.