- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
it’s good the BBC are highlighting this issue im sure they’ve never employed or enabled sex offenders to operate under their watch…
whataboutism is your answer, ffs
Disgusting article by the bbc. Innocent until proven guilty. What they are suggesting should happen in these situations is incredibly dangerous.
Small depressing problem: assuming all the men are innocent means that you’re assuming all the women are guilty
Innocent until proven guilty only means you cannot yet have your freedom taken away.
It doesn’t mean that you can tie the system in knots in an attempt to intimidate or pressurize women out of coming forward.
There’s an element of “innocent until proven guilty” right?
Naturally some MP dives in with the arbitrary ‘role models’ tag, so as to conjur a stick to batter footballers with, just like during covid. I don’t doubt that some footballers are shits, but unless they are convicted I don’t see a story here.
To all those here saying or supporters “innocent until proven guilty”, would you say the same thing in the context of PL’s investigation into City as well ?
If you were as innocent as you’d like to pretend then surely you’d let the premier league see your books
This are such completely different things it’s actually a pretty grim strawman.
Yet they threw the book at toney for doing what all fans do and ran with a False headline to make it sound worse haha
Is one the Arsenal rapist?
The manager one is easy to work out, it could only be one of three.
Why one of three?
Manchester United are playing footballers facing abuse claims. Fixed your title.
I didn’t realise United represents 7 of the current 20 prem teams.
LoL of your starting 11, how many are you ignoring the abuse of? Oh…
Man united are actually the only team who binned off an abuser, got rid of greenwood
This might be because we have the presumption of innocence in this country.
I assume Player X is Partey?
I thought people were innocent until proven guilty. So why should they not continue to be employed and paid accordingly? Silly article.
If only a county would revolt against the British and create an “innocent until proven guilty” standard. Wouldn’t that be something…
The Americans didn’t invent presumption of innocence. The only stuff that the American founding fathers actually came up with is the obviously stupid stuff that doesn’t work. But you all cling to like holy gospel because you’re a bunch of morons.
Not sure if you’re talking about the US, but if so, not a great take. Major sporting organizations here—NFL, MLB, NBA, etc—suspend these fuckers and conduct their own investigation as soon as credible allegations emerge. Unlike the FA, these organizations have a backbone and publicly available protocol protocol that allows them to act.
Charge these footballers and punish them if they are guilty like Greenwood even if the women withdraws the case, because there is enough evidence, but if they are proved innocent don’t push it under the rug like it happened with mendy, the apology should be as loud as the disrespect. And then football clubs should hold these news outlets responsible for wages and transfer fees.
And they call Man City the cheaters ☕️
2 things can be true at once
A non story that will do nothing but fuel harmful speculation