• Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t quite see it like that myself. If you want to potray yourself as a user privacy focused company then why would you even suggest such feature? Even if their intentions are purely to just protect children with zero malicious future plans they still know it’s going to have bad optics and be widely controversial. Headphone jack scandal they just plowed thru but picture scanning was too much

    • monad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      they still know it’s going to have bad optics and be widely controversial

      How would they know that? It’s often hard to predict how users will react, sometimes your expectations are wrong.