Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoMastodon founder touts Threads' federation, saying it makes his X rival 'a far more attractive option'techcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square179fedilinkarrow-up1352arrow-down115
arrow-up1337arrow-down1external-linkMastodon founder touts Threads' federation, saying it makes his X rival 'a far more attractive option'techcrunch.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square179fedilink
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·9 months agoIt “still exists” but user adoption is basically zero, which is the opposite goal of open standards.
minus-squareSCB@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-29 months agoUser adoption here is also “basically zero.” Lemmy is a rounding error in population versus larger sites. It’s a walled garden. You cannot weaken the fediverse more than the near-total lack of adoption that already exists.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 months ago User adoption here is also “basically zero.” Yes and there are a variety of reasons why it is that way, none of which includes being picked up by a megacorp for profit and then being dumped later after they’ve extracted all the value from it.
It “still exists” but user adoption is basically zero, which is the opposite goal of open standards.
User adoption here is also “basically zero.”
Lemmy is a rounding error in population versus larger sites. It’s a walled garden.
You cannot weaken the fediverse more than the near-total lack of adoption that already exists.
Yes and there are a variety of reasons why it is that way, none of which includes being picked up by a megacorp for profit and then being dumped later after they’ve extracted all the value from it.