cross-posted from: https://links.hackliberty.org/post/665784
Some Lemmy instances (e.g. Beehaw) do not support down votes for whatever reason. When an instance does support down votes, authors often get zero feedback with the down votes, which ultimately supports a communities of haters. I’ve noticed some communities struggle to get content because of some malicious down voters who just down vote every post to discourage activity and effectively sabotage the community.
The fix:
An instance admin should be able to flip a switch that requires every down vote to collect a 1-line rationale from the voter. These one-liners should be visible to everyone on a separate page. Upvotes do not need raionale.
Perhaps overkill, but it might be useful if a moderator can cancel or suppress uncivil down votes.
That’s a really stupid idea ngl. Can’t imagine caring about the fake points that don’t do anything, dude
Upvotes/Downvotes are not just some random internet points. On platforms like Lemmy (part of the Fediverse), they are indispensable because they are an essential part of the functional logic of this social media application. You can find a simple example in my second comment on this post.
Can’t imagine caring about the fake points that don’t do anything, dude
Are you saying down votes do not affect timeline positioning and folding?
The fact that this post already has some downvotes but no comments as of why seems to prove the point.
Indeed… I actually predicted that. How can kids resist the urge? The fact that kids and adults are in the same forum supports the idea of having rationale for down votes. There is only justice when down votes (which lead to suppression) are attributed to civil justification.
I’ve expanded the original post to cover this.
