I asked if they were paid what they were worth, not if they were paid. David Zaslav’s salary is $500,000 a year. Why is that justified when many SAG-AFTRA members don’t make the $26,000 eligibility threshold to qualify for health insurance?
Again, they’re worth their salary because the board decided he’s doing a good job. If he didn’t none his workers would have an income. Not making a threshold looks like a policy problem which the gov that should fix. Surely they 're too, adequately paid for their productive labour.
I asked if they were paid what they were worth, not if they were paid. David Zaslav’s salary is $500,000 a year. Why is that justified when many SAG-AFTRA members don’t make the $26,000 eligibility threshold to qualify for health insurance?
Again, they’re worth their salary because the board decided he’s doing a good job. If he didn’t none his workers would have an income. Not making a threshold looks like a policy problem which the gov that should fix. Surely they 're too, adequately paid for their productive labour.
So if the board decides they’re worth ten billion dollars that’s their actual worth? All that matters is what the board decides?