Like A Duck@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoAre you a 10?programming.devimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1395arrow-down125
arrow-up1370arrow-down1imageAre you a 10?programming.devLike A Duck@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 year agoUsing only 2 binary digits: 0: 00 1: 01 2: 10 3: 11 So I’m a 2/3, but also including 0 thats like 75% attractive. That’s a win in my book
minus-squareMxM111@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIf you are using only binary, then you are 10/11.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI did that because in coding, you start counting at zero, so 00=0, 01=1, 10=2, and 11=3. Therefore, if I’m a 10 out of 11, then I’d be a 2 out of 3. However, there are 4 options total, so saying 3/4, or 75% is more accurate.
minus-squareCelivalg@iusearchlinux.fyilinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoNah, it’s 10/10 , you don’t count from 0 to 99, you do from 0 to 10, so that still 100% in binary
Using only 2 binary digits:
0: 00
1: 01
2: 10
3: 11
So I’m a 2/3, but also including 0 thats like 75% attractive. That’s a win in my book
If you are using only binary, then you are 10/11.
2/3? why? that’s strangely arbitrary…
I did that because in coding, you start counting at zero, so 00=0, 01=1, 10=2, and 11=3. Therefore, if I’m a 10 out of 11, then I’d be a 2 out of 3. However, there are 4 options total, so saying 3/4, or 75% is more accurate.
Nah, it’s 10/10 , you don’t count from 0 to 99, you do from 0 to 10, so that still 100% in binary