It’s insane the lengths that some people will go to save a few seconds on their commute, while also endangering others.

  • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Cameras are enforcement without the discrimination and potential for violence that cops bring.

    Traffic calming is great but it’s also more expensive. Maybe drivers should just try driving below the speed limit.

    • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      However it throws hundreds of people through the equally discriminatory criminal justice system, and allows car insurance companies to jack up rates. Functioning even more effectively as a tax on being different than regular cops do. It also creates a financial incentive for the government not to fix the underlying cause of the problem of speeding.

      Wishing and hoping for people to be better than they are isn’t a solution. Just because traffic calming is more expensive, that’s not a reason to not do it. It is something that needs to be done if you want to break car dependency.

    • bear_delune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Incorrect; they discriminate disproportionately on poor people

      Unless the fines are proportional to wealth, I don’t see how you can argue that they’re not disproportionally punishing the poorest who are caught.

      • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I agree the fines should be proportionate, but a police officer doing the enforcement can stop whoever they don’t like the look of whether or not they are actually speeding whereas a camera will only target those who are actually, you know, speeding.