• Overspark@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Which problems? As far as I can tell this solves zero problems for users of websites. Wanting to replace captchas with this is just another arms race that normal users will suffer from.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well, captchas seem likely to become useless in the near future, and are currently a key feature used to prevent unwanted bot activity on many if not most websites. What can replace them?

      Would this technology work better if there were a coalition of attesters that granted access to newer and smaller browsers and os makers?

      • Jajcus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point of the attestation is to show that given browser won’t do some things. If the browser is open source on open source operating system the user can modify it in any way he wants, so not such attestation can be given to such browser.

        Even if we are ok with attested browser being official builds never modified by users, then user could still fake it if they have full control of their operating system. So the operating system must also be attested, so it cannot be freely modified. And what is a point of open source then? You can see, but you cannot touch?

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing. Nothing should replace them.

        You, as a website, unconditionally have zero right to know anything about what a user is doing on their computer.

        Block behavior, not devices.

      • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How can the attester attest that a bot is not using a valid browser on a valid os?