I don’t know what a .webp file is but I don’t like it. They’re like a filthy prank version of the image/gif you’re looking for. They make you jump through all these hoops to find the original versions of the files that you can actually do anything with.

Edit: honestly I assumed it had something to do with Google protecting themselves from image piracy shit

    • Gerula@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could still be on the fence. It’s Google so for sure it has the possibility of tracking or some other user exploiting bullshit feature but we haven’t figure it out yet.

        • minorninth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s also just an open file format. Anyone could implement it, and in fact I found dozens of completely independent implementations of webp decoders on GitHub in various languages.

          There really is no secret ulterior motive in this case.

          • _pete_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            There really is no secret ulterior motive in this case.

            Sort of. Smaller images mean it’s less work for Google to crawl and index them, if every image is 40% smaller then that’s potentially saving them millions a year in storage and bandwidth costs.

            So, yea, it’s better for the web but it also massively benefits them.

            • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, they crawl and index anyways. I see no harm done with .webp. One of my friends said with .webp you can’t save an image because it stops you from doing that somehow? I’m unsure, maybe true maybe not.

          • Gerula@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Open source just like Chromium or Android, right? They’re open source also, right?

          • Gerula@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Open source just like Chromium or Android, right? They’re open source also, right? 😈

            • minorninth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make.

              Chromium and Android really are open-source. There are hundreds of products like Electron and Fire OS built on top of them without any involvement or consent from Google.

              Just because Google Chrome and Pixel phones have some proprietary code doesn’t mean that Android and Chromium aren’t open.