I don’t know what a .webp file is but I don’t like it. They’re like a filthy prank version of the image/gif you’re looking for. They make you jump through all these hoops to find the original versions of the files that you can actually do anything with.

Edit: honestly I assumed it had something to do with Google protecting themselves from image piracy shit

  • elephantium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jpg is ancient

    Sure, but so is .zip, and that’s still useful.

    IMO a better argument would be how and why webp improves on jpg (better compression, etc), not just “it’s newer”.

    I shouldn’t need to say this, but here goes: “old” and “shitty” aren’t actually synonyms.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is more efficient. I thought it’s obvious, that’s why web sites use it, to save traffic and potentially storage. Hence my comparison to video formats. You don’t see YouTube playing videos in Real Media format.

      It’s also more universal, combining features of jpg, png and gif. Gif especially is a dreadful format for what it’s commonly used. It was designed for tiny clipart animations, not HD video clips. Something like x265 can actually be hundreds of times more efficient.