• Lil' Bobby Tables@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read that article but I’m failing to see how it relates to our conversation? We’ve always had biometric data on both criminal suspects and also state employees and contractors. There doesn’t seem to be anything here on explicitly fighting private encryption?

      • leviosa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the section “Access to electronic evidence” and the talk of encryption there, with delegates pressing “lawful access by design”. They aren’t dreaming of lawful access to encrypted byte streams and when there’s a backdoor for lawful access today, it’s available for different laws tomorrow. They do seem like they are on the same page on this, which isn’t surprising since it was floated onto the G7 agenda from wherever globalist policy originates from.

        • Lil' Bobby Tables@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That would literally mean after the acquisition of a search warrant in America, which are generally not easy to get; so I’m still not terribly worried about it. The US isn’t the EU.