• zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      depends how much you value your time. if you’ve nothing to do or just like fucking about with your os in your spare time then sure, linux is free. if you’re, say, a freelance graphic designer and actively losing money whilst trying to learn the foibles of a new os, and just fixing the bullshit that win & mac do by default; then it’s decidedly not

      • stappern@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        i think you only say that because you dont know how to use it, its actually easy when you know how to get around and saves you a lot of time compared to other OS :)

        • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          my dude, i haven’t booted into windows in ages. but that proves my exact point: it might save one time if ones workflow involves a lot of tasks that can be scripted. if ones workflow is “launch photoshop; browse the web for inspiration; draw for a bit; close photoshop.”, it won’t save any time. especially due to the hassle of getting photoshop working, or learning a new app like gimp or krita.

          • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            launch photoshop; browse the web for inspiration; draw for a bit; close photoshop

            hAvE yOu tRiEd GiMp?

            • average Linux fanboy. Thank you for not being one of those!
            • RCKLSSBNDN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh man, that reminds me of the one time I promised a friend to make a poster for an event and my windows lappy died the next day. I had to shoehorn the project into gimp on my tiny netbook.

              It was painful. I’m glad for knowing how to use gimp in a pinch, and it is quite powerful software, but it felt like every tool and setting was in the wrong place after working with PS for so long.

              Also, it goes without saying that designing a full sized poster on a 10" screen is a fools errand.

            • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              to be fair, i actually prefer gimp. but i recognise that different things work for different people, and often it’s not worth learning new software unless it brings significant advantages

          • stappern@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are stuck on a very specific minor use case.

            I also love that humans are born with Photoshop knowledge but they have to learn Krita. xD