• smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sorry but I do not understand what you are trying to say there. Can you elaborate please?

        • smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          We currently have no real way to recycle spent fuel. Only a small percentage of nuclear waste can be recycled and it’s very expensive to do so, that’s why there are only two countries currently recycling fuel: France and Russia. Sellafield in the UK has been closed in the Fukushima aftermath. In France only 10% of nuclear fuel is recycled material using the purex process, which can also produce weapons-grade plutonium and therefore also raises different concerns.

          https://www.goodenergycollective.org/policy/faq-recycling-nuclear-waste

                • smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I don’t think that’s right. The page clearly states “Nuclear reprocessing is the chemical separation of fission products and actinides from spent nuclear fuel.”

                  • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    There’s both, there was a plant in Savanah Ga that was supposed to process nuclear weapons into fuel, but after they got the weapons, they stalled on building the plant.

                    There were other plans to build reprocessing facilities for old fuel in the US (or breeder reactors that can use them as is) that all died off after the fall of the USSR opened up kazakstan, tanking the price of Uranium.