• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You’re lying. That’s why I called you a liar.

    Gnome is the most consistent. That’s an objective, factual statement.

    No, you talked about a Windows UX clone. We get it, you want everything to be a Windows clone.

    Just more consistent

    Lmao

    Anyway, there’s such a thing as ergonomics.

    Something gnome does very well and Windows and its clones don’t.

    Honestly, I don’t know why only Gnome devs seems to care about consistency and ergonomics. It’s maddening.

    BTW, about Windows - w2k and xp were very good in terms of ergonomics.

    HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

    HAHAHAHAHAA

    HAHAHAHA

    HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

    AHAHAHAHAHA

    HAHAHAHAH

    Lol

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      So you don’t have any arguments and apparently think that repeating shit will make it true.

      Any amount of “HAHAHA” is not an argument, and like I said, ergonomics is not a subjective thing.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’ve comprehensively dismantled everything you’ve said.

        We get it, Gnome makes you cry like a little baby and you want a lousy Windows clone, anything else makes your little Microsoft-gimped brain hurt.

        Stick to your Windows with its shit ergonomics lmao. I’ll stick to the best desktop for ergonomics hands-down.