fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agoWaka wakamander.xyzimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1673arrow-down17
arrow-up1666arrow-down1imageWaka wakamander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squaremodifier@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoCan it properly be said to be one stone once it got through the atmosphere?
minus-squareByteJunk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoOf course, it’s like my f+#-: kidney stone. If it was just a bunch of chunks from the start I wouldn’t have pissed blood.
minus-squarebrianorca@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoI doubt the atmosphere had much chance to break it up much since it was 10-15 km wide. Not like the little Chelyabinsk.
minus-squareTIMMAY@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoeh, seems like a technicality that you could reasonably argue either way
Can it properly be said to be one stone once it got through the atmosphere?
Of course, it’s like my f+#-: kidney stone. If it was just a bunch of chunks from the start I wouldn’t have pissed blood.
I doubt the atmosphere had much chance to break it up much since it was 10-15 km wide. Not like the little Chelyabinsk.
eh, seems like a technicality that you could reasonably argue either way