• anonymoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Pretty sure the law doesn’t give a shit what conventions Hollywood has developed and followed over the years. You have a gun in your hand, you pull the trigger, you are responsible for the outcome. Don’t like it? Learn gun safety, ignore what the person handing you the gun claims, check that it’s unloaded yourself. Hollywood conventions need to change to align with reality.

    Edit: I’ve been out of the loop. I wasn’t aware they dropped charges against Baldwin. That’s really fucked up in my opinion, as per the above.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How does that apply to a weapon that is supposed to be loaded? It’s a movie set, it’s not always intended to be unloaded, it’s intended to be LOADED but with blanks. That’s part of the reason why a movie set has personnel dedicated to ensuring the safety of every firearm. Additional reasons include: they’re swapping out identical guns for different takes, they’re doing multiple takes, actors have dramatically different levels of experience with handguns, they’re EXPECTED to point the gun at people, etc etc etc

      A Hollywood movie set isn’t the same as your basement dry-fire LARPing sessions just because they both involve acting.

    • kethoth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Last I saw, they had proven the gun could be discharged without touching the trigger. They also use dummy rounds in revolvers to make it look like the gun has real rounds instead of blanks (cheaper than CGI and less likely to miss one), the only way to tell they aren’t real is to remove each round and shake them as they have rattles. I don’t expect an actor to be an expert in firearms, just like I don’t expect them to be experts on politics or climate change.