• Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, Lemmy has the same fundamental flaws that reddit has: it’s anonymous, free and it allows bots to post freely. The more popular it becomes, the more it will resemble reddit, to its detriment. I can already see it happening.

      But what can you do? Facebook isn’t anonymous, and it’s a bigger shithole than reddit. If you made people pay, then you wouldn’t get engagement, and in a site like this with such a wide variety of communities, without huge engagement content is sorely lacking. And how will anyone ever be able to control bots after the LLM revolution?

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, Lemmy has the same fundamental flaws that reddit has: it’s anonymous, free and it allows bots to post freely. The more popular it becomes, the more it will resemble reddit.

        To a point, perhaps. There’s no need for the toxicity to come from both the top down as well as the bottom up like it did with reddit. I can’t imagine most lemmy instances hosting r/jailbait, r/fatpeoplehate, or keeping r/the_donald around for years after they helped organize a nazi rally.

        I’m reassured by the open hostility toward bigotry I’ve seen on lemmy. I hope that in particular persists.

        I’m firmly of the opinion that any community that welcomes bigots is truly welcoming only to bigots. Since it is possible to display monstrous inhumanity using only civil language, any moderation policy that focuses heavily on policing language while coddling bigots eventually boils down to a “don’t sass the nazis” policy, which was far too common on reddit. I hope lemmy does not go down that road.

        I also hope that reddit levels of toxicity are not inevitable for any network with sufficient participation to make it a useful resource for niche subjects.